Search for: "Branch v. Mays"
Results 761 - 780
of 6,279
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2011, 7:39 am
In May the CEO sent the Chief a letter reiterating Martel’s intentions. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 7:00 am
The first intervening case was the Court's 2020 decision in Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:44 pm
Watersheds Project v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 7:07 pm
These rulings may instead reflect a change in governing precedent: a shift from judicial deference to the political branches in the 18th and 19th centuries to a juristocracy sparked by Chief Justice Taft’s invalidation of statutory removal restrictions in Myers v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 4:21 am
Although that second branch--called substantive due process--has long been controversial, Justice Alito's majority opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 1:01 am
Due to anti-German sentiment in the United Kingdom during World War I, George V changed the name of his branch from “Saxe-Coburg and Gotha” to “Windsor” in 1917. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 2:17 pm
Plus, the court says the government did its homework on this topic: The multi-year efforts of both political branches to investigate the national security risks posed by the TikTok platform, and to consider potential remedies proposed by TikTok, weigh heavily in favor of the Act. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 7:19 am
His appeal in Noriega v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
In Lewis v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 6:26 pm
Deere & Co. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 5:46 am
The status report presents Judge Tanya Chutkan with a stark choice about the meaning of Trump v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 9:30 pm
Last May, the Supreme Court denied a petition for review of the First Circuit’s decision in a case called Upper Blackstone Water Pollution Abatement District v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 12:43 pm
The policy at the heart of United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
The Charter does not apply to private litigation; s. 32 specifies it applies to the legislative, executive and administrative branches of government. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 11:27 am
The plaintiff states in Louisiana v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 10:00 am
Circuit’s 2010 opinion in Al-Bihani v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:36 am
A motion to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) may be granted only where the documentary evidence utterly refutes the complaint’s factual allegations, conclusively establishing a defense as a matter of law (see Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 12:10 pm
The deliberative process privilege may be asserted by the executive branch more generally, not just the President. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 2:55 am
Although an attorney's affirmation may serve as an expert opinion establishing "[a] basis for judging the adequacy of professional service" (Zasso v Maher, 226 AD2d 366, 367), here, in opposition to the plaintiff's prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the attorney's affirmation submitted by the defendant was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the plaintiff was negligent in his representation of her in… [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:15 am
Although an attorney's affirmation may serve as an expert opinion establishing "[a] basis for judging the adequacy of professional service" (Zasso v Maher, 226 AD2d 366, 367), here, in opposition to the plaintiff's prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the attorney's affirmation submitted by the defendant was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the plaintiff was negligent in his representation of her in… [read post]
