Search for: "Bright v. State" Results 761 - 780 of 3,211
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2019, 6:29 am by Jacques Singer-Emery
Paradis stated that the default rule, set by Supreme Court precedent in Lijeberg v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:48 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lady Hale gave a concurring judgment in which she agreed with Lord Sumption that, given the need for a practicable and proportionate scheme, bright-line rules are necessary, and that the categories used are proportionate, save as to the two exceptions Lord Sumption identified. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 6:18 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In this case, the Court upholds the search of a man who was arrested for possessing child pornography, involving the "good faith" exception under the Fourth Amendment.The case is United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that by agreeing to hear the New York gun case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 6:56 pm by Joseph Koncelik
”  The rule states it intends the new definition to establish “bright lines” as to what is regulated and not regulated to give greater certainty. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 6:56 pm by Joseph Koncelik
”  The rule states it intends the new definition to establish “bright lines” as to what is regulated and not regulated to give greater certainty. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 2:28 pm by Kyle T. Mordew
Our last case law discussion comes to us from the Ohio Supreme Court in Embassy Healthcare v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 2:28 pm by Kyle T. Mordew
Our last case law discussion comes to us from the Ohio Supreme Court in Embassy Healthcare v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
On a bright August day in 1993 a boat approached us while we were checking our nets. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:49 am
finding that unregistered design rights are more commonly litigated and have a much higher success rate than registered designs: There's a new IPO report on designs infringement - game-changer or stating the obvious? [read post]