Search for: "C. K. R."
Results 761 - 780
of 4,035
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2011, 3:56 pm
P. 4(k)(1)(C), and hence jurisdiction in this Court. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 6:38 am
Streeter, Joseph C. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 8:16 am
It was just a few days ago that Advocate General Szpunar issued his Opinion[discussed here]in the important Afghanistan Papers case, ie Funke Medien, C-469/17. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm
The fact that the application was refused on the same ground of indefiniteness of the point of intersection must have come as a surprise to the appellant because the objection is based both on new facts (the replacement of the expression “linear object” by “thin object” in claim 1) and on new technical considerations that had not been communicated to the appellant beforehand.Therefore, the Board agrees with the appellant that the decision of the ED, insofar as it is based on… [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
In this respect the Board concurs with R 17/11 [19] in which the Enlarged Board of Appeal made it clear that in appeal proceedings it is upon a party to make sure that the points it wishes to raise are actually raised in the proceedings. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 12:17 pm
Bu tablo son derece ürkütücüdür" dedi. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm
A process for producing florfenicol ([R-(R*, S*)]-2,2,-dichloro-N-[1-(fluoromethyl)-2-hydroxy-2-[4-ethylsulfonyl) phenyl]ethyl]acetamide), which comprises: (a) preparing a compound of formula (I): wherein R is CH3S02; and R” is aryl, halo aryl, benzyl, substituted benzyl, C1 to C6 alkyl, C3 to C7 cycloalkyl, and haloalkyl, and the configuration of the oxazoline ring is 4R trans by contacting a compound of formula II: wherein R is as described above,… [read post]
7 May 2007, 10:10 am
Before ROBERT R. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
Wаgе gаrnіѕhmеntѕ аrе tаkеn оut of рауrоll аnd іt fоllоwѕ a particular оrdеr: fіrѕt fеdеrаl tаx, thеn local tax, lаѕt order gаrnіѕhmеntѕ is tаkеn frоm сrеdіt… [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
Wаgе gаrnіѕhmеntѕ аrе tаkеn оut of рауrоll аnd іt fоllоwѕ a particular оrdеr: fіrѕt fеdеrаl tаx, thеn local tax, lаѕt order gаrnіѕhmеntѕ is tаkеn frоm сrеdіt… [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 2:10 am
The court therefore reversed the previous decision and agreed to grant an injunction against K C. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 7:13 am
an borçlarda veya kamu gücü iradesinden do? [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
The board thereby follows the well-established case law on the interpretation of R 86(4) EPC 1973 see, e.g., T 708/00 [17], T 274/03 [5,6] and T 141/04 [5], it being noted that R 86(4) EPC 1973 has the same wording as R 137(4) (as in force at the date the ED took its decision), which, as from 1 April 2010, is included in R 137(5). [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 9:25 am
John C. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
R 137(3), last sentence, EPC provides that no further amendment may be made without the consent of the ED. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
This latter rule, by incorporation of R 41(2)(c), defines the standard formal administrative items of information required to fill out the notice of appeal, which will permit the identification of the appellant. [read post]
19 May 2022, 12:56 pm
Sie können dabei eine bestimmte Ausbildung verlang [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
As to the required substantiation of the ground(s) of opposition, the function of R 55(c) EPC 1973 (now R 76(2)(c)) is, inter alia, to establish the legal and factual framework within which the substantive examination of the opposition is in principle to be conducted, thereby giving the patentee a fair chance to consider his position at an early stage of the proceedings (see G 9/91). [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 2:20 pm
c? [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:45 pm
isim doğrulaması yapamadığımız, MEHMET rumuzlu ziyaretcinin yorumlarından alıntıdır. [read post]
