Search for: "CF-3" Results 761 - 780 of 2,385
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2018, 4:27 am by Jessica Kroeze
Final RequestsThe Appellant requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent be revoked.The Respondent requested that the appeal be dismissed and that the patent be maintained as granted (main request) or, if this is not possible,that the patent be maintained on the basis of the claims according to one of the following auxiliary requests, to be taken in their numerical order:- auxiliary requests 1, 3, 6, 7 and 9 as filed with the reply to the statement of grounds of… [read post]
19 May 2018, 2:38 pm
See §102(3) (stating as one of the Code’s “rules of construction” that “‘includes’ and ‘including’ are not limiting”); A. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:54 am by Dennis Crouch
For example, claim 3 adds inter alia the following limitations to claim 1: identifying a neonate with hypoxic respiratory failure, determining whether the neonate has left ventricular dysfunction, and “evaluating the potential benefit of treating” that neonate with nitric oxide “vs. the potential risk” of doing so. [read post]
1 May 2018, 4:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Englese allegedly made about him: 1) he gives poor legal advice, 2) he is a shitty lawyer, 3) he caused Ms. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:17 am by Erica Vaccarello
  Easy Sanitary Solutions v Group Nivelles,  C-361/15, on the irrelevance of the sector of use to determine novelty and individual character), but also 3d marks (cf. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:16 am by Guido Paola
Thus the process concerns the production of oxygen for the purpose of fuelling a power generation system of the integrated gasifier combined cycle type, commonly referred to by its acronym IGCC.The impugned decision concluded that the process defined in claim 1 lacked novelty on the consideration that claim 1 is merely related to a "process for producing oxygen" that is restricted to the production of oxygen in a cryogenic air separation system, while the stated use "for fuelling an… [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:16 am by Guido Paola
Thus the process concerns the production of oxygen for the purpose of fuelling a power generation system of the integrated gasifier combined cycle type, commonly referred to by its acronym IGCC.The impugned decision concluded that the process defined in claim 1 lacked novelty on the consideration that claim 1 is merely related to a "process for producing oxygen" that is restricted to the production of oxygen in a cryogenic air separation system, while the stated use "for fuelling an… [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 2:07 am by Diane Tweedlie
Similarly, in the description (cf. paragraph [97]) reference is made to the frequency of the radiated space energy. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 2:07 am by Diane Tweedlie
Similarly, in the description (cf. paragraph [97]) reference is made to the frequency of the radiated space energy. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 1:44 pm by Sabrina McCubbin
The report determines that, because of McCabe’s understanding of the significance of the investigation and his experience as a law enforcement officer, “his claim that his unequivocal denials under oath, on two occasions within 3 months of one another, were the result of being surprised by the questions” was not credible. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Can you sensibly plead all 3 causes of action. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:40 pm
Introduction and Context Over the last half century or so the debates about corporate social responsibility (CSR) split along two distinct lines.1 The first touches on the nature of corporate personality and is rooted in domestic law regulating enterprises specifically and legal persons generally.2 The second touches on the nature of the rights of individuals and more generally of society, and is rooted in international law (and sometimes domestic constitutional law) defining the scope of the human… [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 2:13 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  The court found factual disputes about the applicability of various exceptions to California’s right of publicity and the Lanham Act, including a reading of nominative fair use that makes it a dead letter/a defense only when confusion is unlikely (cf. [read post]