Search for: "CHANCELLOR v. CHANCELLOR"
Results 761 - 780
of 2,432
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2011, 8:48 am
Finally, the newest member of the Court, Vice Chancellor Glasscock, discussed “poison pills” and in particular Chancellor Chandler’s February 15, 2011 decision in Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court just issued the anticipated opinion in City of Westland Police v. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 9:00 am
Since Stone v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am
The Court of Appeal has handed down judgment in Lloyd v Google LLC [2019] EWCA Civ 1599, a decision with significant implications for data protection law and practice. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Tornetta et al. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Tornetta et al. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 1:08 pm
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Tariquez-Zaman v London Deanery of Post Graduate Medical and Dental Education [2008] EWCA Civ 1226 (06 November 2008) PS (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 1213 (06 November 2008) SK (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 1204 (06 November 2008) Blackburn & Anor v West Midlands Police [2008] EWCA Civ 1208 (06 November 2008) RA (Sri Lanka) v… [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 1:59 pm
Katzman v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 10:01 pm
Last Friday in the case of PPF Safeguard v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 6:08 am
The Delaware Court of Chancery has issued its much anticipated post-trial decision in Snow Phipps Group, LLC v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 4:04 am
Services, Inc. v Jupiter Partners, L.P., 309 AD2d 288, 300 [1st Dept 2003]). [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 12:23 pm
Notice the prominence of the issue in this recent interview with German Chancellor Angela Merkel. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 11:35 am
I previously discussed Beard v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:37 pm
In the case of Snow Phipps Group LLC v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 9:11 am
In Todd Swift v. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 5:20 am
The recent decision of Rodgers v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 4:56 am
” Considering a related aspect of the appeal, the Appellate Division noted that the administrative hearing conducted by the Chancellor's Committee "was not determinative but merely advisory" to the Chancellor and thus the "arbitrary and capricious" standard of judicial review applies, not the "substantial evidence" standard. [read post]
22 May 2008, 1:50 pm
In Sun Times v. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
The discussion below is based upon the Chancery Court decision in Airgas, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 11:42 am
In Edwards v. [read post]