Search for: "CROSS v. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2014, 4:55 pm
A California Court of Appeal decision, King v. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 6:31 am
Maintaining the trial court’s award of $1,250 per violation – half of the maximum of $2,500 allowed under California law – the appeals court ordered Ethicon to pay over $300 million to the state. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 3:55 pm
Judge Henderson opens by acknowledging the cross-country journey by the plaintiff’s attorney, Paul Hoffman, who came from Venice, California, to argue before the court today. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 3:57 pm
Jennings’ Spisak theory was a defense of his judgment on alternative grounds, so he was not required to take a cross-appeal or obtain a certificate of appealability to argue it. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:21 am
Replacements (Forbes Cross-Post) Telephone Consumer Protection Act Case Update – Summer 2013 Edition Telephone Consumer Protection Act Case Update – February 2013 Edition California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) Court: Customer Consents to Receive Texts by Providing Phone Number to Pharmacy – Pinkard v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 2:35 pm
The trial court ruled against Petitioner SOHO on its CEQA claims, which SOHO abandoned on its cross-appeal by failing to provide supporting argument or authority in its brief. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
The sentence followed a no contest guilty plea after the California Court of Appeals issued an opinion in May 2007 which held that authorities could cross state lines to pursue criminal charges against Dr. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 8:30 am
Seaton v. [read post]
The new smartphone patents battlemap (infographic featuring Apple, Huawei, Intel, Qualcomm, Samsung)
14 Oct 2018, 11:52 am
Samsung (just thinking of the presidential veto of an ITC import ban and the first Supreme Court ruling on design patents in well over 100 years), Apple v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:26 am
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT JOHN PORTER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 6:54 am
Supreme Court decision in Epic Systems v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 6:54 am
Supreme Court decision in Epic Systems v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 3:38 am
Michael appealed “the partial denial of his motion, and Pamela cross-appeals the dismissal of her harmful access by computer claim. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 3:47 pm
The defendant then entered a conditional guilty plea in which she reserved her right to appeal the denial of the motion to dismiss.The due-process standard to be applied here comes from California v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 5:50 pm
"), the Court of appeal concluded that the trial court erroneously considered the merits of the action, rather than whether the action was amenable to class treatment.The decertification train got rolling after Rite Aid cited the recently decided matter of Duran v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, 105 Cal. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
As Derek Muller has explained, that practice appears to have begun in 1968, when California and New York refused to include the name of the 33-year-old Eldridge Cleaver to appear on their ballots for President (see Cleaver v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 3:30 am
The Ohio Supreme Court recognized that 30 years ago in State v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 5:01 pm
Kolsuz is the first federal appellate case after the Supreme Court’s seminal decision in Riley v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 2:31 pm
The court also held that County of Santa Barbara Flower & Nursery Growers Assn. v. [read post]
