Search for: "California v. Arizona"
Results 761 - 780
of 2,004
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2011, 10:26 am
It seems possible that the Circuit Court will now ask both sides in the federal case of Perry v. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 5:12 pm
” The Miranda rights, named after the landmark Supreme Court case Miranda v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 4:17 am
In Ayestas v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:30 pm
Neither justice mentions In re Gault, the 1967 Arizona case the Supreme Court agreed to hear exactly one week after announcing Miranda v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Int’l., and their FLSA claims in the district court in Arizona, Stickle v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 4:53 pm
Beard and Wiggins v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 3:35 pm
Tuesday, December 9 Arizona v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 8:25 am
Arizona (Petitioner) Bowers v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 7:40 am
California (1963) (373US546) — Indian Water Rights to Colorado River v. (25) Iowa Mutual v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 5:30 am
Muehlbauer v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 4:42 pm
Whitt v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm
California (Laramie Boomerang). [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 12:05 pm
Enough said. v [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 1:36 pm
Brown v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:20 pm
Griggs v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 12:25 pm
The inmates, who are in jails in Arizona, California and Tennessee, sued the FDA in U.S. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 11:12 am
As Apple and Google are based in California, not Arizona, the argument is apparently made by the bill's opponents that this is interstate commerce and Arizona is just trying to favor its own companies, but again, the vote on constitutionality was unanimous and in favor of this proposal.Assuming for the sake of the argument that Arizona (though it could also be any other state) passed such a statute into law, what would happen? [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 12:17 pm
In Habeas Corpus Resource Center v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:30 am
Supreme Court took up the case of United States v. [read post]
