Search for: "California v. Gross"
Results 761 - 780
of 857
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2009, 1:40 am
California Daily JournalRESULT DATE: April 28, 2009Arthur Lewis, Jesse Lewis, Arthur Lewis III, a minor, by and through his Guardian ad Litem, Linda Benton, Nathaniel Lewis, a minor, by and through his Guardian ad Litem, Camille Davis v. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 2:07 pm
[update: the judgment confirming the award in Chester v. iFreedom is here; from Settle It Now] In case you have not heard, a California court has confirmed recently a $4.1 billion award for an employment-related dispute. [read post]
23 May 2009, 3:43 am
Because AT&T's pension payments accord with a bona fide seniority system's terms, they are insulated from challenge under Title VII §703(h).o May 18, 2009 decision hereo SCOTUS docket hereo SCOTUSwiki hereo Noted here: Reuters; Connecticut Employment Law Blog; Yahoo; WAPO; Christian Science Monitor; Bloomberg; Shaw Valenza; NYTimes; FYI: Central Ohio Employment Law Update; Ross Runkel; Paul Mollica; SCOTUSblog (opinion recap); Fisher &… [read post]
6 May 2009, 1:11 am
"49 This statute was made use of in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 4:57 am
” Budrow v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 8:50 am
Under the Stimulus Bill, small businesses whose gross receipts do not exceed $15 million can elect to carryback net operating losses incurred after 2007 as many as 5 years. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:26 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 4:00 pm
In City of Stockton v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 10:56 am
(in support of the petitioner) Brief amicus curiae of NEXTG Networks of California, Inc and the Das Forum (in support of petitioner) Brief amicus curiae of the City of St. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 6:41 pm
In Chindarah v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 9:54 am
NLRB Law Memo 02/13/2009 by LawMemo - First in Employment Law. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 5:43 pm
" (Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 3:08 am
Gross, No. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 11:06 am
California Appellate Districts, December 29, 2008 Grossmont Union High School Dist. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 12:17 am
See Gonzalez v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 7:22 am
Moreover, the trial court agreed with Farmers, and the position cannot be deemed so unreasonable as to evidence malice, fraud, or gross negligence.This opinion doesn't really add much to the body of California law regarding the standards for imposition of punitive damages. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 11:00 pm
Vasquez v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist) Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC Supreme Court:… [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 10:45 am
That changed in Payne v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
Bulter Issue: Whether the Court’s ruling in California v. [read post]
