Search for: "Carter v. May"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,603
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2011, 5:38 am
Carter. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 1:17 am
In Nixon v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 1:08 pm
Carter, 9 So. 3d 1258, 1261 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009). [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
: (IPBiz) Global - Copyright Musopen puts classical recordings, scores in public domain: (Ars Technica) Events 26-27 May : EU Workshop for mediators in IP disputes – Geneva: (IPR-Helpdesk), 27 May: Oliver Rivers to give short talk on ‘spurious precision’ – London: (IP finance), 28 May / 11 June: US PLI ‘Advanced patent licensing 2008: What you need to know before licensing your patent’ – New York / San… [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 11:20 am
In what seems like a remarkably begrudging semi-admission [which may be due to its particular panel members], the panel in Titan Tire Corp. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 2:11 pm
Recent Case Law In the matter of Matthew Carter Apartments v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 1:23 pm
The Supreme Court in Attorney-General of Saskatchewan v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 am
The Hawaii v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
It neither mentioned the historical examples of Presidents Carter, Bush, Clinton, or Obama, nor cited the Sale case.Then there is the Fifth Circuit, Knoetze v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 4:31 pm
Carter v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:32 am
Therefore, the factfinder may conclude that the evidence would have been unfavorable to the spoliator. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 4:18 pm
Canada In the case of R v Jones 2017 SCC 60, the Supreme Court held that text messages may attract a reasonable expectation of privacy even after they have been sent and received. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm
The trial is currently listed for 4 May 2021. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:43 am
Carter is not controlling legal precedent. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 8:49 am
When the court hears a second oral argument in Sturgeon v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:04 am
” This was the view of the Carter Administration, which supported overseas ATS jurisdiction in Filartiga v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Emody v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 11:46 am
We recognize it may have been difficult for [plaintiff] to meet the challenge of showing a specific defect. . . . [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:55 am
(for now) – District Court C D California judgement in Carter Bryant v Mattel (Property, intangible) (Trademark Blog of the Trademark Lawyer’s Mind) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Golden – Plaintiff need not attach copyright registration to complaint: Golden v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm
Whereas the statutory tenancy is unassignable, not an estate in land but a mere "personal right of occupation" (see Lord Greene MR in Carter v SU Carburetter Co [1942] 2 KB 288, 291), a secure tenancy is an orthodox estate in land which, subject to specific restrictions in the 1980 Act, can be assigned, held in joint names, pass by survivorship and be disposed of by will on death. [read post]
