Search for: "Case v. People"
Results 761 - 780
of 52,383
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
Up until this case, that position had support in domestic law (see AL (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 42, [2008] 4 All ER 1127; R (Hooper) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 29, [2006] 1 All ER 487; and R (S) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [2004] UKHL 39, [2004] 4 All ER 193). [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 8:58 am
Many people seems to be wondering how Judge Brett Kavanaugh will vote in abortion cases if confirmed to the Supreme Court, and more specifically if he will vote to overturn Roe v. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 11:53 am
(Eugene Volokh) Here’s the opinion in People v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 10:19 am
In Arista v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 12:55 pm
It's unusual for an actual case to mimick a joke. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 11:27 am
For example, take this case. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 12:30 pm
Here's a case from Humboldt County. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm
Regardless of what happens to you thereafter (and, as Justice Liu notes, one-third of people arrested for a felony don't ultimately get convicted of one). [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 12:21 pm
For another, if and when they do sufficiently change, I have a strong feeling that the initial articulation of a "right to incest" won't be made in a case like this one. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 12:32 pm
Everyone concedes that his belief that the thing -- in this case, his mother -- was a demon is relevant to the sanity phase. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:58 am
Steffel v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 12:04 pm
I'm reading this case, which is in the California Supreme Court, and I had an inkling that, since it was there, it was probably a death case. [read post]
18 Dec 2024, 9:39 pm
The issue arises in cases where a claimant invokes the discovery rule. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 3:45 am
Ice impacts State v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 1:36 pm
People v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:06 pm
(People v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 1:09 pm
Justice Raye ultimately reverses the sentence in this case. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:47 pm
In the case of Brown v Texas, the People's burden of proof as to the programmatic purpose is derived from the constitutional principle underlying the reasonableness of a suspicionless roadblock stop, i.e., a weighing of the gravity of the public concerns served by the seizure, the degree to which the seizure advances the public interest, and the severity of the interference with individual liberty. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
”PEOPLE V. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 12:40 pm
Holder (the defendant is always named as the current Attorney General — the case started out as Golan v. [read post]
