Search for: "Colorado v. United States" Results 761 - 780 of 2,281
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2022, 6:35 am by Erik W. Weibust
We have written recently about legislative action in various states concerning their restrictive covenant laws, including Washington state’s prohibitions on nondisclosure and nondisparagement provisions in employment agreements, a proposal in Connecticut to codify limitations on noncompetes, and a law passed in Colorado that would limit the use and enforcement of noncompetes and non-solicitation provisions. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 2:37 am
She has obviously been chosen to appeal to female voters, but she lacks both the experience and policy positions to serve as Vice-President of the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 3:17 pm by Brady Iandiorio
Recently, United States District Court Judge Miller ruled in favor of a motion for partial summary judgment in the case of Continental Western Insurance Company v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 11:26 pm
The court indicated that its decision was consistent with the only other Colorado case interpreting Section 113,  Mastercar, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 5:26 pm
The court indicated that its decision was consistent with the only other Colorado case interpreting Section 113,  Mastercar, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:50 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
My regular Thursday column will survey recent decisions across the United States which touch upon non-compete or trade secret issues. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 5:57 pm
The insured, O’Hara Regional Center for Rehabilitation (“O’Hara”) is a long-term care facility in Denver that was licensed by the State of Colorado to provide specialized nursing home care, and provided such care pursuant to agreements with the United States and the State of Colorado under the Medicare and Medicaid programs. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The United States Supreme Court predictably handed down the Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
United States, an ineffective assistance of counsel case in which the lower court held that the defendant could not prove that he was prejudiced by his attorney’s erroneous advice to plead guilty, which resulted in mandatory deportation, because the evidence of his guilt was overwhelming. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:32 am by Aurora Barnes
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit’s reasoning in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:13 pm by Amy Howe
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, in which the court ruled that a baker who refused on religious grounds to create a custom cake for a same-sex wedding celebration had been treated unfairly by a state agency. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 12:48 pm by Jim Martin
Some of the filings submitted to the United States Supreme Court in the original jurisdiction case Texas v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:09 pm
Lawmakers’ content- or viewpoint-based intentions generally don’t invalidate facially content-neutral speech-restrictive laws, see United States v. [read post]