Search for: "Council v. State"
Results 761 - 780
of 11,013
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
Canadian Council for Refugees v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 4:10 am
In OW and OV v Members of the Board of the Wesley Mission Council, (NSWADT, Dec. 10, 2010), the Administrative Decisions Tribunal of the Australian state of New South Wales held that the New South Wales Anti-Discrimination Act does not require a religiously-sponsored social service organization to approve same-sex couples as foster care providers. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 8:51 am
The common law principles of state immunity allows foreign countries to plead state immunity, the USA could have pleaded state immunity from the outset, however in this case it failed to do so. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 2:00 am
On Monday 27 April 2020, the Privy Council will hear the appeals of Director of Public Prosecutions v Lagesse & Anor (Mauritius). [read post]
22 May 2014, 6:29 am
The employee was a fire marshal employed by the FDNY and a candidate for the New York City Council. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:53 pm
Babenko v Ukraine Appn No 68726/10 of 4/1/12 is an ECHR Chamber decision which looks at the relationship between an applicant’s right to social housing from the state and Art 1 of the ECHR First Protocol.The Applicant was a WWII veteran who registered in 2004 for social housing with the local housing executive. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:53 pm
Babenko v Ukraine Appn No 68726/10 of 4/1/12 is an ECHR Chamber decision which looks at the relationship between an applicant’s right to social housing from the state and Art 1 of the ECHR First Protocol.The Applicant was a WWII veteran who registered in 2004 for social housing with the local housing executive. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 10:37 am
It is Jesus Arrieta v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:10 am
The Supreme Court will spend the first half of this week hearing the appeals in three related cases: R (MA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, R (A), and R (Rutherford). [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:00 am
The decision below: Rutherford and A Following the Court of Appeal’s judgment in R (MA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, the claimants in Rutherford and A were (necessarily) at pains to show that their position was more closely analogous to Burnip v Birmingham City Council than to MA. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 1:32 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
In relation to control, no material difference as regards the position of the state. 15.07: Thomas de la Mare QC takes the Court through the cases of Barnado and Mallin v Clark. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 5:20 pm
The rule of law, as observed in Roncarelli v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
In Arizona v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 10:50 pm
See Residents Opposed to Kittitas Turbines v State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council (EFSEC). [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 7:00 am
In John Doe 169 v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
Hampton v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 6:52 am
On 24 February 2021, the Portuguese Presidency of the Council held a working group meeting dedicated to continue the review of the European Commission’s proposal for the regulation on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA). [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 1:44 pm
(The Association for Molecular Pathology, et al. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 5:16 am
[iii] See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
