Search for: "DAVID S. KENNEDY"
Results 761 - 780
of 2,682
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2017, 7:40 am
For example, David Cole told the Financial Times that the Supreme Court “allowed the government to bar from entry only people who were not part of the lawsuits at issue. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 4:31 am
” David Boyle weighs in on the court’s first opinion in the travel-ban case at Casetext. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 6:38 am
Kennedy writing for himself and Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen G. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 9:05 pm
” [James Copland, Case Western Law Review] Kennedy’s opinion for Court cites Cato amicus brief in Packingham v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 4:42 am
Commentary comes from Ira Lupu and Bob Tuttle at ACS blog, David Cortman in an op-ed for the St. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
But on the question whether Obergefell entitles same-sex married couples to all the benefits of marriage—rather than just a marriage license with some or none of the benefits states accord other married couples—there is no room for debate.The majority opinion in Obergefell, written by Justice Kennedy, repeatedly admonishes that same-sex couples have a right to “civil marriage on the same terms and conditions as opposite-sex couples. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:52 am
The post Afternoon round-up: Today’s orders and opinions appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:09 am
But, based on reports from Saturday night’s Kennedy law clerk reunion, David Lat at Above the Law and Jess Bravin in The Wall Street Journal cast doubt on the prevailing rumors. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 9:42 pm
Kennedy Is Not Retiring Tomorrow; Based on this weekend's reunion of his law clerks, reports of AMK's retirement are greatly exaggerated. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 1:17 pm
One must realize that basic elements of what we have taken for granted as foundations of our constitutional order may rest on Anthony Kennedy's decision to retire or stay the course. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 8:54 am
Steve Vladeck outlined his critiques of Justice Kennedy’s analysis of Bivens damages, as set forth in the majority opinion in Ziglar v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 6:35 am
" In today's edition of The Los Angeles Times, David G. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
Commentary comes from David Alan Sklansky at Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 8:54 pm
" David Kravets of Ars Technica reports that "There's a constitutional right to use social media, Supreme Court says; North Carolina's law was 'unprecedented in the scope of First Amendment speech.'" Chris Geidner of BuzzFeed News reports that "Supreme Court Strikes Down State Ban On Registered Sex Offender Social Media Use. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 1:38 pm
Both Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion and Justice Alito’s concurrence in the judgment assumed without deciding that the law was content neutral, and thus applied the intermediate scrutiny test used for content neutral laws. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:56 am
Four other justices – Justices John Paul Stevens, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, David Souter and Stephen Breyer – believed that courts should be able to review partisan-gerrymandering claims. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 2:28 pm
The list of prominent Democrats spotted in attendance is considerably shorter, consisting of Bennet and lawyer David Frederick, Gorsuch’s former law partner. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 11:38 am
Parts of the court’s statutory analysis on nationality discrimination follow reasoning first laid out – I believe – by David Bier of the Cato Institute, in assessing Trump’s initial travel ban. [read post]
