Search for: "DAVIS v. LITTLE"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,012
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2020, 1:00 pm
The court’s decision in Fulton v. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 4:46 pm
Former cabinet minister David Davis has warned that SLAPP (strategic litigation against public participation) libel actions are having a chilling effect on UK journalism, the Press Gazette reports. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Doe v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:23 pm
IT-Davy, 74 S.W.3d 849, 853 (Tex. 2002). [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog) US Patents – Decisions Split Federal Circuit panel finds preamble language not limiting: Marrin v Griffin (GRAY on Claims) (Inventive Step) District Court E D Texas: Inequitable conduct expert could not testify as to materiality absent qualification as a person skilled in the art: Advanced Technology Incubator, Inc v Sharp Corporation et al (Docket Report) District Court N D California: Intracompany patent transfer strikes again:… [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:42 pm
” She adds that if that all sounds a little abstract, “some examples should make the point. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:42 pm
Cummings, 1973; Davis v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 9:03 am
Cariou v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 7:27 pm
Hirsh, Marco V. [read post]
28 May 2021, 6:39 am
Perhaps the court just needs a little more time to consider whether to grant, vacate and remand for further consideration of the case in light of Caniglia. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
Zaden v. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 2:03 pm
” Davis v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am
And if that dream is still just a little modest for you, how about if the government disavows the position it took below? [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:32 am
United States and NFIB v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm
CVSG: 5/18/2023 (relisted after the June 22 conference) Davis v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Mukasey, No. 07-3031 Where Petitioner's state drug conviction could have been for nonremunerative transfer of as little as two grams of marijuana, his conviction is the equivalent of a federal misdemeanor under the Controlled Substances Act and therefore not an aggravated felony under the INA. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 11:10 am
Parke-Davis, 147 F. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 10:10 am
However the CPS guidance quotes "DPP v McKeown, DPP v Jones ([1997] 2Cr App R, 155, HL at page 163) [where] Lord Hoffman defined a computer as "a device for storing, processing and retrieving information". [read post]
13 May 2007, 11:44 pm
PARTNERSHIP v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 9:31 pm
(To give only one example, in 2000, in U.S. v. [read post]
