Search for: "Day v. United Securities Corporation"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,598
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2016, 7:40 am
" (Recommendation p. 10).If that is what the Ethics Council is suggesting, it presents an interesting and useful application of the 2nd Pillar of the United Nations Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights (corporate responsibility to respect human rights) to enterprises independent of their legal obligations under the more formally legal 2st Pillar state duty to protect human rights. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 7:43 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 2:33 pm
The trustees and proxies run the cleared company independently, and are subject to the foreign owners’ control only in relation to the following “life or death” corporate decisions: (i) the sale or disposal of all or a substantial part of the company’s assets, (ii) pledges, mortgages, or encumbrances on the capital stock, (iii) corporate mergers, consolidations, or reorganizations, (iv) dissolution, or (v) a declaration of bankruptcy. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 2:11 pm
The trustees and proxies run the cleared company independently, and are subject to the foreign owners’ control only in relation to the following “life or death” corporate decisions: (i) the sale or disposal of all or a substantial part of the company’s assets, (ii) pledges, mortgages, or encumbrances on the capital stock, (iii) corporate mergers, consolidations, or reorganizations, (iv) dissolution, or (v) a declaration of bankruptcy. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 3:33 am
” New York courts have held that “good faith” is the exercise of honest judgment in the lawful and legitimate furtherance of corporate purposes. . . . [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 7:56 am
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm
On the same day, Warby J heard an application in the case of Theedom v Nourish Trading Ltd Green J also heard an application in the case of Smith v Persons Unknown. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 1:03 pm
” As support, he pointed to the Court’s recent decisions in Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm
” Phil Lee, Privacy, Security and Information Law. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
The petitioner in Life Technologies Corporation v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 5:34 am
Bell Atlantic Corporation v. [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 8:23 am
CommentsThe Section’s comments are organized according to the 4 parts of the Draft Provisions on which the Section offers comments: (I) validity of resolutions by shareholder/board of director meetings; (II) shareholder right to be informed; (IV) preemptive rights; and (V) derivative lawsuits. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:23 am
Medical Capital Holdings, Inc.; Medical Capital Corporation; Medical Provider Funding Corporation VI; Sidney M. [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:00 am
It’s the Friday before Memorial Day, which means if you’re reading skimming this post, you’re probably experiencing an interminable wait in an airport security line, wearing a neck pillow, and actively loathing the family of four ahead of you. [read post]
26 May 2016, 12:25 pm
Two days later, he spoke at a panel discussion for the Brooklyn Bar Association, where he defended the Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 5:04 pm
Moore v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 2:33 pm
[iii] One driver may be the state of the economy in the United States today. [read post]
10 May 2016, 4:21 pm
The test adopted by the Delaware courts [See, e.g., Tooley v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 3:57 am
Navar, Inc. v. [read post]
