Search for: "Deal, et al v. Grant, et al"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,002
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Some have argued that, because the Nation’s approach to climate change is politically contested,[1] and since these matters affect major policy questions over which Congress has not granted the SEC new, explicit powers, the Commission lacks authority to require disclosure in this area.[2] For the reasons given below, the Commission should disregard these claims, focusing instead on the challenging policy choices that any finalization of the proposal would require. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 10:44 pm
Dell et al (CAFC 2009-1589) precedential; Judges Radar, Newman (author), Prost The claims were for a keyboardless computer, with a memory for storing an application, a processor for excuting the application, an application generator, and a run-time utility operating in conjunction with the processor. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 12:09 pm
Plus, they have to deal with these pesky claimants all day long.)Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction! [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 7:50 am
Leung Tak Lun, et al., 944 F.2d 642 (9th Cir. 1991) but advised the United States that its grant of authority for that one deposition should not be regarded as precedent and there has been no subsequent record of China permitting a deposition. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 10:15 am
Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan et al., case number 3:19-cv-05360, in the U.S. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
Roberts, et al., Respondents, vTishman Speyer Properties, L.P., et al., Appellants. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm
” The report said that Fin4 was targeting the email accounts of top executives, lawyers and others in an effort to obtain non-public information about merger and acquisition deals and major market-moving announcements. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm
NURSES YOLANDA LOPEZ ET AL McAllen Hospitals, L.P. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(EPLAW) The Hague District Court: Ex parte injunction granted: Street Surfing LLC v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
Because we are lawyers, and we will spend a great deal of time defending the rights of our clients before tribunals set up for that purpose, it is critical to consider the role of courts and their relationship to law. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
Nos. 06-10465-WGY, et al., slip op. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am
Hise (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) District Court S D New York: Court nukes another mass defendant file-sharing lawsuit: Digiprotect v Does (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court E D Virginia calls out copyright trolls’ coercive business model, threaten sanctions K-Beech v Does 1–85 (EFF) (Ars Technica) District Court… [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 7:42 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
MacKinnon v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:11 am
The 6-2 decision (with Justice Elena Kagan not taking part) came in the case of Golan, et al., v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:16 am
Kim DotCom et al, U.S. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:23 am
Kim DotCom et al, U.S. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 3:43 pm
Department of Transportation, et al. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 4:29 am
National Hockey League, et al., 2021 FC 488 (F.C.) [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm
Summary Judgement was granted to the defendants in the case of Abulrazaq v The Trustees of the Exeter Mosque and Cultural centre [2021] EWHC 3252 (QB). [read post]
