Search for: "Doe v. National Medical Services" Results 761 - 780 of 1,917
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
  But as Bexis has observed, forum-shopping plaintiffs have been almost-universally unsuccessful in arguing Michigan law does not apply. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 11:05 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists How does the Supreme Court possibly top the excitement of last Friday’s fourteen new grants — including grants in a few important First Amendment cases? [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 12:33 pm by John Elwood
Smith, which held that the free exercise clause does not prohibit the enforcement of generally applicable laws that incidentally burden religious conduct. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm by Bexis
”  Plaintiff does not claim that Medical Economics did test [the drug] and was aware of its addictive qualities but nonetheless failed to warn its readers of that fact.Libertelli v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:41 pm by admin
Subsequently, President Trump declared a National Emergency[2] on March 13, 2020 related to the current COVID-19 outbreak. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Curiouser and curiouser.Well, Conte is an end run around the heart of modern product liability, which was created - not just for California but for the nation - in Greenman v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:26 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Congress and state governments almost certainly will be forced to deal with these broader challenges regardless of the outcome of King v. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 9:38 am
Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services": "The appellate court held that the burden of proof of a secondary market is on the state agency, not the applicant, and the proofs submitted by state agency of a secondary market (i.e. internet websites advertising sales of structured settlements and lottery winnings) did not meet the burden of proof. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 8:25 am by Venkat
(A separate issue--and one this statute does not address directly--is whether employers engage the service of data aggregators to look into profiles or prospective employees and conduct de facto credit checks.) [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 7:30 pm
In its November 2001 report, the National Committee on Vital & Health Statistics (NCVHS) mentions PHRs and the growing consumer use of Internet-based health information services.[3] Early on, PHRs were used in a rudimentary fashion as a way for individuals to track their own specific health care information. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for Bloomberg, Joe Nocera argues that this week’s decision in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 2:23 pm by Lyle Denniston
The ruling came in the case of Thomas More Law Center, et al., v. [read post]