Search for: "Doe v. Scalia" Results 761 - 780 of 4,942
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am by INFORRM
If it does not, then Donald Trump may already have commenced a vehicle in which the Supreme Court could complete the job. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 9:31 am
Moore, 487 U.S. 354, 381 (1998) (Scalia, J., concurring) (collecting cases). [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 4:21 am
Justice Scalia's concurrence highlights that the analytical framework of this decision differs from the Court's expansively inclusive residual clause analysis last term in James v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:33 pm by Kevin Johnson
  Justices Scalia and Alito generally seemed unsympathetic to the petitioner’s arguments. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 7:07 am by Erin Miller
  Justice Thomas filed a concurrence, joined by Justice Scalia, in Wilkins. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Justice Scalia expressed his view forcefully in a dissent in the 2001 case of United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:07 am by Joey Fishkin
First, a big thank you to Jack for inviting me to contribute to the blog.The fulcrum of the 5-4 divide in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 1:45 pm
Professor Ann Graham, a banking law scholar, focuses on a few of the surprises in today's decision in the Watters v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 4:55 am by Amy Howe
”    On Wednesday, the Court issued its decision in Luis v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 5:19 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday the president nominated Merrick Garland to fill the vacancy created by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:42 am by Abbe Gluck
 Justice Scalia, an ardent proponent of judges not engaging in “legislation” under the guise of interpretation, has argued that the Court’s role is to adopt the interpretation that “does least violence to the text” (Green v. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 11:55 am by JB
Trans. 47-48What does Justice Scalia mean by “racial entitlement” in this context? [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 6:30 pm
This week, the Supreme Court took the rare step of deciding an asylum case, Negusie v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 10:55 pm by Will Baude
  As Justices Thomas and Scalia discuss in their separate dissents in Mitchell v. [read post]