Search for: "Does, A-H" Results 761 - 780 of 16,614
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
We will answer those questions and provide the Q&A on our H-1B Visa Lawyer Blog. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 6:00 am
We will answer those questions and provide the Q&A on our H-1B Visa Lawyer Blog. [read post]
11 May 2015, 6:00 am
We will answer those questions and provide the Q&A on our H-1B Visa Lawyer Blog. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
We will answer those questions and provide the Q&A on our H-1B Visa Lawyer Blog. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
We will answer those questions and provide the Q&A on our H-1B Visa Lawyer Blog. [read post]
Sending in a question by email or any other means does not create an attorney-client relationship. * This is an advertisement. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 2:00 am by Michael H Cohen
Here are some of the comments made by Michael H Cohen: Clinicians have the same informed consent obligations whether they are providing conventional or CAM therapies, says Michael H. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 3:46 pm by Parks, Chesin & Walbert
One group to whom that exception does not apply, however, are workers who may work at agribusiness sites but who are not employed in agricultural work. [read post]
24 Jul 2006, 8:18 am
§ 362(h) does not create a private right of action would require us to ignore its plain and express language. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 3:19 pm
Furthermore, an H-1B dependentemployer must state that they will not layoff any similarly employed U.S. workerwithin 90 says before and 90 days after the date the petition for an H-1B employee isfiled. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 7:17 am by Jessica A. Huse
The court’s decision reinforced that even when spoliation efforts are ultimately unsuccessful, and therefore Rule 37(e) does not apply because information is not “lost,” sanctions remain available under Rule 37(b)(2) and the court’s inherent authority to address litigant misconduct, including outright fraud on the court. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 7:17 am by Jessica A. Huse
The court’s decision reinforced that even when spoliation efforts are ultimately unsuccessful, and therefore Rule 37(e) does not apply because information is not “lost,” sanctions remain available under Rule 37(b)(2) and the court’s inherent authority to address litigant misconduct, including outright fraud on the court. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 7:17 am by Jessica A. Huse
The court’s decision reinforced that even when spoliation efforts are ultimately unsuccessful, and therefore Rule 37(e) does not apply because information is not “lost,” sanctions remain available under Rule 37(b)(2) and the court’s inherent authority to address litigant misconduct, including outright fraud on the court. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:00 am by Charles Sartain
T.Brown, who presided over suits against Dad Joiner and H L Hunt over the Daisy Bradford No. 3 in the 1930’s. [read post]
In addition, and contrary to some concerns that have been raised, the Proclamation does not impact F-1 and H-4 employment authorization provided under an EAD (work authorization card). [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 6:38 am
Section 87, subsection (h) '87(h) - If the association does not accept the declarant's settlement offer, or if either the association or the declarant does not accept the arbitrator's determination, then the association may commence any legal action the association deems appropriate, provided that prior to the filing of any complaint commencing a legal action against the declarant, a majority of the association's… [read post]