Search for: "Does 1 - 21" Results 761 - 780 of 18,600
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm by Bill Marler
The health department was notified about the outbreak on September 21, 2021, after the first case was reported by a local hospital. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 11:12 pm by Josh Blackman
Rev. 443, 472 (2018) (citing 1 Farrand's Records, supra note 21, at 20–22, 20 n.10). [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm by Thomas James
(1) Purpose and character of the use. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 10:54 am by Yosi Yahoudai
Just after 1:30 a.m., officers with the Folsom Police Department responded to a solo vehicle accident involving a 21-year-old Lincoln woman who drove off the road, the department told ABC10. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:00 pm by Howard Gutman
She stated that she was the primary driver and that her boyfriend does not drive the Cadillac. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Respectfully, we also write to raise serious concerns about the reliability of Professor Lash's writings on Section 3 and to make clear what the historical record does—and does not—say.[1] By answering seven questions, we will show that (1) there was a First Insurrection, (2) John B. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Will Baude
Does conduct of a particular description, in a specific set of circumstances, on its own unique facts, constitutes having "engaged in" "insurrection or rebellion" within the meaning of the Constitution? [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm by Josh Blackman
" (And odd comments given that the Sinecure Clause does not use "chosen" at all. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
Cas. at 26.In his opening brief, Donald Trump appeared to preserve this argument, though just barely:  He didn’t devote any space to it.[1]  His reply brief does even less with it than that, offering only the ambiguous sentence “that section 3 may be enforced only though the congressionally enacted methods of enforcement,” without even arguing that Chief Justice Chase got it right in Griffin’s Case. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:22 am by Eliav Lieblich
Then, I argue that the geographical nexus requirement, in fact, is extremely difficult to defend in terms of the lex lata, legal policy, literature or practice.[1] This piece does not, however, discuss in detail the obligations in fact owed to Protected Persons in situations or territories once the geographic nexus requirement is rejected. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 6:56 am by Dennis Crouch
GM Global Technology Operations LLC 21-2348. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 6:32 am
 (discussed on the Forum here) by Scott Hirst, Kobi Kastiel, and Tamar Kricheli‐Katz; Does Enlightened Shareholder Value Add Value? [read post]