Search for: "Does 1-59" Results 761 - 780 of 3,024
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2016, 7:28 pm by Michael Smith
United States, 440 U.S. 48, 55, 99 S.Ct. 914, 918, 59 L.Ed.2d 136 (1979); Matter of Jones, 768 F.2d 923, 927 (7th Cir.1985). [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 8:57 am by Gene Quinn
Patent No. 7,463,124 (“the ’124 patent”); claims 1-11, 13-28, 30-59, 61-64, and 74-83 of U.S. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 3:03 am by war
In this case, this evidence does not establish that Network was the prior owner through use. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 6:03 pm
Article 59 of Regulation 40/94, which lays down the conditions for bringing an appeal before the Board of Appeal, does not refer to the submission of facts or evidence, but only to the filing, within a time‑limit of four months, of a written statement setting out the grounds of appeal.61. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:10 pm by Russell D. Knight
  For an alimony receiver who does not work, the alimony payor could be paying over 40% of his or her income for alimony after taxes. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 11:26 am by David Fraser
Prosser delineated a four-tort catalogue, summarized as follows, at p. 389: 1. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 3:43 am by Broc Romanek
– FAQ #28: How does ISS evaluate an equity plan proposal seeking approval of one or more plan amendments? [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 3:43 am by Broc Romanek
– FAQ #28: How does ISS evaluate an equity plan proposal seeking approval of one or more plan amendments? [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 1:48 pm
Kummetz, (1995), 59 B.C.A.C. 81 at para. 19,  Abbott Estate v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 7:46 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
This exercise of enforcement discretion will enter into effect immediately and expire on March 1, 2022, at 23:59 ET, subject to any further extensions. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:53 pm
Unless otherwise stated, the effective date of the legislation is July 1, 2011. [read post]
Order does not apply at all to: (1) health care operations, which includes hospitals, clinics, laboratories, dentists, pharmacists, medical cannabis dispensaries, veterinary care, etc. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 5:14 am
After a jury convicted Robert Eleck of “assault in the first degree by means of a dangerous instrument in violation of General Statutes § 53a–59 (a)(1)”, he appealed. [read post]