Search for: "Drewes v. State"
Results 761 - 780
of 2,857
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2018, 11:22 am
The POP will consist of: Andrei Iancu, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Drew Hirshfeld, Commissioner for Patents, and Scott R. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:10 am
It noted that the problem of deciding the Court’s temporal jurisdiction had been considered with varying results in previous cases, notably Blecic v Croatia (2006) 43 E.H.R.R. 48, Moldovan v Romania (2007) 44 E.H.R.R. 16, Balasoiu v Romania (App. no. 37424/97), 2 September 2003, and Kholodova v Russia (App. no. 30651/05), 14 September 2006. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 5:05 pm
In the case of Almeida Leitão Bento Fernandes v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 7:27 am
Hobbs, holding that Arkansas prison officials cannot prohibit a Muslim inmate from growing a half-inch beard, drew commentary from Dawinder Sidhu, who at Religion and Politics suggests that “[a] plausible claim can also be made that Holt foreshadows the end of affirmative action in the United States. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 11:46 am
In Sybase, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 11:10 am
New Relists City of Boise, Idaho v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 2:29 pm
Castillo concluded that appellant could not be excluded as the source:The conclusion that we drew on that comparison is that Herman Whitfield cannot be excluded as a possible contributor to the profile from that item. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 1:29 am
[Post by Venkat, with additional comments by Eric] Facebook v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 9:54 am
In Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
Ackermann v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Alexander v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 3:48 am
In Hotchkiss v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 7:24 am
Four years ago, in Davis v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 9:10 am
Drew, which considered whether Terms of Service violations trigger CFAA liability, and United States v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:55 pm
RC3 v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:04 am
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 1:39 pm
The court notes that, during the sign-up process, an alert states “BY CREATING AN UBER ACCOUNT, YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF SERVICE & PRIVACY POLICY. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 10:00 pm
Mahavisno v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 3:52 am
” Drew v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:33 am
The Lord Chief Justice drew attention to Lord Diplock’s comments in Wright v British Railways Board [1983] 2 AC 773 that the Court of Appeal is “generally speaking the tribunal best qualified to set guidelines for judges trying such actions” particularly given the “inescapably artificial and conventional nature of the assessment of damages for non-economic loss”. [read post]
