Search for: "EXXON CORPORATION"
Results 761 - 780
of 828
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2008, 6:12 am
And The New York Times reports today that "Flooded Village Files Suit, Citing Corporate Link to Climate Change. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 5:53 am
" Exxon Mobil Corporation, one of the main targets in the suit, declined comment until it could completely review the complaint. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 7:57 am
This is a case of corporate irresponsibility and abuse of the legal system at its worst. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 8:31 pm
But there's hope for HR pros and managers looking to see what their wiki-wielding workers (OK, I promise I won't do that again) are doing to their corporate entries. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 3:17 pm
Prominent examples include Kodak, Clorox and Exxon. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 12:30 am
" The plaintiffs call it "about three weeks of Exxon's current net profits. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 9:36 am
Devens argues that Exxon Mobil relies on outdated maritime law principles that no longer reflect today's realities, and he argues that punitive damages must be available in maritime law cases to deter irresponsible corporate behavior. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 9:24 pm
After Keker's minions swoop in to do their edits, the Mississippi attorney may wind up portrayed as the next Mother Teresa, and not the Hitchens version either [WikiScruggs] Same general category of point, my Wikipedia entry now suddenly describes me as "controversial", when but a month ago I wasn't; $28 to $52 million in 18 months for serving as a DoJ "corporate monitor" sounds like nice work if you can get it, and former AG Ashcroft got it without… [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 5:15 am
We discussed whether greater diversity on the board, for example, would have resulted in Exxon taking a less vociferous stance against efforts to curb global warming. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 2:34 pm
Readers found hundreds of self-serving edits and revisionist cuts by the likes of Diebold, Dow Chemical and ExxonMobil -- the latter tweaked the entry on the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill to whitewash the effect on Alaskan wildlife. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 7:27 pm
Supreme Court that the $2.5 billion it was ordered to pay in punitive damages -- one of the largest awards ever against an American corporation -- was in conflict with more than 200 years of maritime law. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 3:20 pm
— for its work on a class-action lawsuit brought 15 years ago against Exxon Mobil by a group of gas-station owners. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 10:15 am
Perhaps the practice of law is different from the Exxon-Valdez and other corporate disaster situations as it really comes down to the reputation of the individual at the top of the company rather than crisis management. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 2:31 am
George Cody, formerly a scientific advisor at Exxon Corporate Research Laboratory and an expert on photovoltaics, was present on the tour and at the later reception at the Greenway Land Trust's Johnson Education Center. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 5:15 am
The heat is on, so to speak, with respect to global warming and corporate behavior. [read post]
3 Nov 2007, 5:15 am
Many who oppose access purport to favor state law regulation of corporations. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 5:15 pm
Blawgletter reported yesterday about the Supreme Court's accepting review of the $2.5 billion punitive damages award in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 12:48 am
Exxon Asks Supreme Court to Limit $2.5 Billion Spill Tab
Legal Times
The Supreme Court agreed on Monday to review the $2.5 billion punitive damage award levied against Exxon Mobil for its role in the massive Exxon Valdez oil spill. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 1:57 pm
From WSJ: "The Supreme Court Monday extended its examination of punitive damages against corporations by taking up a $2.5 billion award against Exxon Mobil Corp. over the 1989 Valdez oil spill in Alaska. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 10:23 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] granted certiorari Monday in a dispute over the punitive damages to be paid by Exxon Mobil [corporate website] for the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill [EPA backgrounder]. [read post]
