Search for: "Fish v. United States" Results 761 - 780 of 1,859
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2016, 9:20 am by Abbott & Kindermann
” Plaintiffs Alaska Oil and Gas Association (“AOGA”), the State of Alaska, and North Slope Borough (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed separate lawsuits in the United States District Court for the District of Alaska challenging the listing decision. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 1:20 am by Glen C. Hansen
” Plaintiffs Alaska Oil and Gas Association (“AOGA”), the State of Alaska, and North Slope Borough (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed separate lawsuits in the United States District Court for the District of Alaska challenging the listing decision. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 8:08 am by Christopher M. Cobb, Esq.
Protection, landowners lost a constitutional challenge to beach renourishment and the United States Supreme Court held that Florida’s beach restoration program was permissible. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 6:19 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
According to a recent news report from the Sun Sentinel, the United States Coast Guard was out on a routine patrol when they discovered a 32-foot center console fishing boat crashed upside down on a rock jetty extending into the harbor. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 12:22 pm by Rory Little
The court has long recognized (in United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
The first female Stanford law professor was also first director of the District of Columbia Public Defender Service, one of the first women to be an Assistant Attorney General of the United States, and the biographer of California’s first woman lawyer, Clara Foltz. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:31 pm
This post briefly examines the potential salience of the High Court’s decision in Cole v Whitfield to the interpretation of Part XIII, in terms of methodology and substance.Cole v Whitfield concerned a challenge to a clause of the Sea Fisheries Regulations 1962 (Tasmania) prohibiting the taking or possession of undersized fish. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 10:31 am by Michael Grossman
After evaluating her claim, the district court ruled in favor of Match.com, citing Title 47, Section 230 of the United States Code, known as the Communications Decency Act (CDA). [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:40 am
" (Recommendation p. 10).If that is what the Ethics Council is suggesting, it presents an interesting and useful application of the 2nd Pillar of the United Nations Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights (corporate responsibility to respect human rights) to enterprises independent of their legal obligations under the more formally legal 2st Pillar state duty to protect human rights. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 1:11 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Courts of Appeals Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/2016cta.htmlUnited States v. [read post]