Search for: "Fisher v. District Court"
Results 761 - 780
of 915
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2009, 11:00 am
Intended Loss: Defendants argued that the district court erred in instructing the jury that it could convict them for intended loss. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 9:12 am
District Court for the Districts of Hawaii and Guam. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 12:19 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 8:39 am
The district court agreed. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 11:32 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 2:30 pm
The Supreme Court in Brenner v. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 1:09 pm
Fisher v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Skelos, a State Senator elected from the 9th Senatorial District, commenced this action for a declaratory judgment that the Governor's appointment of Mr. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:35 am
Assumption of Risk Although courts generally hold that cheerleaders assume the risk of injuries while cheerleading, this assumption may not completely bar them from recovery.[44] However, some courts still find that since there is a high and definite risk of physical harm involved, a school does not owe a duty to cheerleaders to provide adult supervision and monitor their activities.[45] To build a case for… [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 6:21 am
A shudder went through the state, and the state supreme court in People v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 10:58 am
The California Court of Appeal (Fourth District, Division Two) issued this unpublished opinion last week, reducing a punitive damages award from $750,000 to $150,000 in a case involving $15,000 in compensatory damages. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 5:09 pm
So imagine my glee upon reading the (sadly unpublished) opinion in Miller v. [read post]
22 Aug 2009, 7:30 pm
United Reporting, 528 U.S. 32 (1999), and Fisher v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 9:07 am
On appeal, the 9th (O'Scannlain joined by Goodwin and Fisher) reasoned that it should be the court that had discretion. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 10:26 am
Here's a good example.It's an ineffective assistance of counsel habeas case that gets dismissed by the district court and, back in April of 2008, is unanimously affirmed by the panel, which consists of Judges Beezer, Trott and Randy Smith.The case then gets taken en banc. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 11:31 pm
District Court for the Middle District of Alabama 2009). [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
(The Prior Art) Suggestions for fixing the US patent system (IP Watchdog) Obscure patent: Scriptured outdoor furniture (IP Watchdog) Published applications as prior art (Patently-O) Requester success rates in inter partes re-examination (Patently-O) Innovation Alliance video (Patently-O) Question on dedication of material (Patently-O) Bilski case: Financial services, patent experts seek more certainty on business-method patents (Intellectual Property Watch) US Patents –… [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 5:38 am
The district court said that it would not consider the disparity between state and federal sentences. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 2:13 pm
By Eric Goldman Zango, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 6:53 am
Kaspersky Lab, Inc., affirming the district court's decision that Kaspersky's filtering decisions were protected under Section 230. [read post]
