Search for: "GEORGIA-PACIFIC" Results 761 - 780 of 897
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2009, 1:30 pm by Michael C. Smith
  Judge Love selected the analysis, consisting of Paice plus a helping of modified Georgia-Pacific, and agreed with the plaintiff's expert that the 20% rate that the jury found should be adjusted upward to 23% for an ongoing royalty in light of the parties' changed relationship, and Yahoo! [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
A number of lawsuits have been filed on behalf of homeowners against American construction product manufacturers, including Georgia Pacific and National Gypsum. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 5:26 pm
" (quoting Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 4:23 pm
He also received his Doctor of Medicine from Wayne State University, and Interned for Residency in Psychiatry at California Pacific Medical Center and went on to earned his Post Doctorate in Forensic Examination and Forensic Medicine. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 12:00 pm
Gateway, Inc. from the Southern District of California was considered in many quarters as the potentially seminal case on how to calculate damages based on a reasonable royalty using the Georgia-Pacific factors, especially the “entire market value” rule (aka factor 13). [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 10:24 am by Steven Taber
Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport in Georgia was awarded almost $34 million in stimulus funds through the Federal Aviation Administration’s Airport Improvement Program, to help pay for construction of a new terminal. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 12:29 pm
Union Pacific Railroad Co., 50 S.W.3d 226, 249 (Mo. 2001); Lopez v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
“Maricopa County’s particulate air pollution is a serious problem,” said Deborah Jordan, director of the Air Division in the EPA’s Pacific Southwest office. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:01 pm
Gateway, Inc. from the Southern District of California was considered in many quarters as the potentially seminal case on how to calculate damages based on a reasonable royalty using the Georgia-Pacific factors, especially the "entire market value" rule (aka factor 13). [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 1:56 pm
Gautam Gupta ("Gupta") in connection with insider trading charges in Georgia Pacific Corporation. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 8:47 am
Indergard wanted to return to work, so Georgia Pacific sent her for a physical capacity exam (PCE). [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 11:00 am
"In addition to our efforts in support of the Governor of American Samoa, we recognize the significant impact of current disasters in other Pacific regions, including Indonesia, the Philippines and Taiwan," said FEMA Administrator Craig Fugate. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 6:17 am
Georgia-Pacific Corporation, No. 08-35278 (9th Cir. 2009), the plaintiff, Kris Indergard, bought an action against her employer, defendant Georgia-Pacific Corporation ("Georgia-Pacific"), claiming that Georgia-Pacific had violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (the "ADA") by terminating her employment based on her failure to pass a physical capacity evaluation. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 6:13 am
Fathi of Human Rights Watch has a piece in the Huffington Post detailing the ongoing ordeal of Georgia death row inmate Troy Anthony Davis. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 10:54 pm
See Georgia-Pacific, 195 F.3d at 1326 ("Under obviousness-type double patenting, a patent is invalid when it is merely an obvious variation of an invention disclosed and claimed in an earlier patent by the same inventor. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:58 pm
Gateway, Inc. from the Southern District of California was considered in many quarters as the potentially seminal case on how to calculate damages based on a reasonable royalty using the Georgia-Pacific factors, especially the "entire market value" rule (aka factor 13). [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 12:48 pm
Both arguments were rejected by the Court of Appeals for reasons which languished within the thirty subsequent pages of analysis that considered the 15 factors to be addressed when calculating patent damages in Georgia-Pacific v US Plywood Corp (1970).Factors 2, 10, 11, and 13 were considered by the Court in full:Factor 2: "The rates paid by the licensee for the use of other patents comparable in the patent suit. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
See Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 6:22 am by Donald B. Brenner
., and drywall manufacturers, Georgia-Pacific Corp. of Atlanta, Georgia as defendants. [read post]