Search for: "Gregory v. United States" Results 761 - 780 of 991
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2010, 9:35 am by Susan Brenner
As Wikipedia explains, since 1961 the United States has used the exclusionary rule to enforce the protections of the 4th Amendment. [read post]
To many more, including the United States’s allies and partners, whose proximity to Russia and China necessitate a hyperfocus on great power competition, President Biden’s announcement that “America is back” is a welcome opportunity to fend off the erosion of international norms that have ensured decades of regional stability. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 6:48 am
Government Has Joined Two San Francisco Federal Court Whistle-Blower Suits Against J&J Subsidiary, United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm by Norman L. Eisen
Last month, however, a three-judge appeals court panel in DC – two Trump appointees, Judges Gregory Katsas and Neomi Rao, and H.W. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 10:44 am
Gregory “voted to grant appellant a stay of execution until the Supreme Court decides Baze v. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm by Hannah Pugh
Second, EPA must show that waste from a CAFO has entered the waters of the United States before the agency can require an NPDES permit. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 8:28 am
It would also allow diplomats and Taiwanese military to display their flag and wear their uniforms while in the United States on official businesses. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 8:14 am by Florian Mueller
(United States International Trade Commission) in September and in Munich (Munich I Regional Court) in October. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 2:38 pm by Thornhill Law Firm, APLC
Levine is scheduled to be heard November 3, 2008 before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:02 am by Ilyse Schuman
Attorney Gregory Katsas, arguing on behalf of 26 state attorneys general, the National Federation of Independent Business and four private individuals, and Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr., who represents the United States, both asserted that the individual mandate is enforced by a penalty, not a tax, and is therefore not subject to the AIA. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 4:25 am by Peter J. Sluka
When parties have gone outside the boundaries that the state has set, it makes sense that the state would treat the impermissible act as if it never occurred. [read post]