Search for: "HARMS v. HARMS"
Results 761 - 780
of 36,731
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2024, 8:38 am
Bungie has also provided evidence that the fraudulent notices harmed its reputation and caused it to devote significant resources to attempt to remediate the harm. 512(f) wins are so rare that each one is noteworthy. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am
See James v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Notwithstanding tobacco’s high death toll and damaging health effects, tobacco companies have survived hundreds of lawsuits challenging their promotion and distribution of a deadly drug, including Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:00 am
Clem v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 4:00 am
For example, the famous 1976 California Supreme Court case of Tarasoff v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:26 am
Here is how the explanatory note formulates the suspicion: “the Commission is assessing TikTok’s risk management related to its (i) potentially addictive design, (ii) the service’s risk of leading users down ‘rabbit holes’ of harmful content, and (iii) the effectiveness of TikTok’s measures for preventing minors from accessing inappropriate content, in particular age assurance tools. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:05 pm
For an individual to qualify for an NPA, the disclosure must meet strict criteria, including the following: (i) the disclosure must involve original information, not something already known to the DOJ; (ii) it must relate to one of six specific legal violations, ranging from money laundering and various types of financial and health care fraud to public corruption; (iii) the individual making the disclosure cannot be the CEO, the CFO, a high-level foreign official, any domestic official, or… [read post]
2 May 2024, 7:36 pm
[1] Vance v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 7:07 pm
Oklahoma v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 3:47 pm
Part V concludes. [read post]
2 May 2024, 2:27 pm
Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:22 pm
In SIA v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:20 pm
Green v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:30 am
Connecticut and Stanley v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:11 am
” O’Brien v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 5:00 am
# # #DECISIONRGNY. v Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London [read post]
2 May 2024, 3:05 am
But Justice Masse sided with the protestors, noting the importance of free expression and a lack of irreparable harm.☎️ The BC Court of Appeal upheld a new duty of care for 911 operators. [read post]
1 May 2024, 11:00 pm
’” Since it was unclear, that by joining the soccer team, RGM accepted the risks of weightlifting, and given that there were questions as whether the school provided “proper supervision and instruction,” particularly in light of RGM’s “expressed concerns” and the supposed threats by an assistant coach that RGM would be removed from the team if he didn’t engage in the squat exercise, the AD2 agreed that dismissal of the case was inappropriate and that… [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:01 pm
In the many cases (at the lower courts and the Supreme Court) upholding parts or all of regulations and court injunctions limiting protestor activity near clinic entrances and procedure rooms, noise has been one of the factors courts have held can be meaningfully taken into account by regulators because the noise itself interferes with a clinic’s function, and that harm must be considered alongside the interests of the protestors.CleanlinessAnother significant regulatory concern that… [read post]
