Search for: "Harmon v. Harmon" Results 761 - 780 of 1,657
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2015, 5:28 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
This would be a similar situation as abortion following R. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 6:25 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Here are a few more of her greatest hits for those not hip to her work:Still Convicting the InnocentProsecutorial Exceptionalism: Remedial Skepticism, and the Legacy of Connick v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 1:40 pm by Stephanie Clark
On November 30, 2015, the California Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 12:48 am
 Details of the event can be found here and to register please click here.Big brains to meet in Brussels at EPLAW congress:  This year's EPLAW congress is being held this Friday in Brussels where the likes of Kevin Mooney (Simmons & Simmons), Pierre Véron (Véron & Associes) , Edward Nodder (Bristows), Klaus Haft (Hoyng Rokh Monegier), Benjamin Ostapuk (Intel), Penny Gilbert (Powell Gilbert) and József Tálas (Sar… [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 6:08 am by Dennis Crouch
Supreme Court in Kewanee Oil Co. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 12:15 am
Belgium; JGC Corp. v, Spain; plain packaging; global supply chain; intellectual properties; interaction between trade and investment law; geopolitics of the TPP; transparency; harmonization; standards of protection; investor-state dispute settlement. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
Harmonizing the provisions of the [Marketable Title Act] with the recording statutes contained in R.C. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 5:07 am by Terry Hart
— Eminent copyright scholar Jane Ginsburg on the Second Circuit’s recent decision in Authors Guild v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 10:57 am by Larry
I get that if the Harmonized System Committee changes the law, Customs will implement the change. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 7:06 am by Miriam Wugmeister
Yesterday the European Court of Justice (ECJ) followed the core of the Opinion of the Advocate General (AG) in Schrems v. [read post]