Search for: "Herring v. State" Results 761 - 780 of 58,296
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2022, 5:14 am by Frank Cranmer
In Scottish Federation of Housing Associations v Jones [2022] EAT 114, Ms Jones was Head of Membership and Policy of the Federation. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 7:21 pm by The Federalist Society
 The question is whether Sachs’ purchase of her rail pass in the United States brought her suit within the commercial activity exception. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:31 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
Trial court denied her motion for a new trial, but on appeal, the state supreme court granted her request. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:32 am
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, LOS ANGELES COUNTY BUSINESS FEDERATION, CENTRAL VALLEY BUSINESS FEDERATION, and WESTERN GROWERS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:32 am
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, LOS ANGELES COUNTY BUSINESS FEDERATION, CENTRAL VALLEY BUSINESS FEDERATION, and WESTERN GROWERS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm by Public Employment Law Press
., Local 100, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v City of Mount Vernon 2022 NY Slip Op 04023 Decided on June 22, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm by Public Employment Law Press
., Local 100, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v City of Mount Vernon 2022 NY Slip Op 04023 Decided on June 22, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
2 May 2023, 5:00 am
Similarly, her allegations with regard to the nature of her claim (in that she set forth the manner in which she was injured, and how the State was negligent), were also found to be “sufficient. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:00 am by Riccardo Calzavara, Arden Chambers
The Court of Appeal was bound by the decisions in Zalewska v Department for Social Development [2008] UKHL 67; [2008] 1 WLR 2602 and Kaczmarek v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] EWCA Civ 1310; [2009] PTSR 897. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 4:13 am
An individual must prove his or her case by a “preponderance of the evidence” in order to prevail at a “name-clearing hearing”Casale v Metropolitan Transp. [read post]