Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 761 - 780
of 4,276
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2020, 8:10 am
If the latter, then this may be contrasted with the approach taken by Pumfrey J in Abbott v Ranbaxy [2004] where he stated that had he not granted summary judgment on validity grounds, he would have granted a preliminary injunction. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm
[ii] Nearly one out of every 11 United States publicly traded companies faced a securities lawsuit in 2019. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 12:28 pm
(quoting United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 2:55 pm
The Secretary of State can designate foreign groups "Foreign Terrorist Organizations," which makes it a crime for people to give them various "material support or resources" (see, e.g., Holder v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 4:04 pm
§1101(a)(3) (defining "alien" to include "any person not a citizen or national of the United States") with §1101(a)(22) (defining "national of the United States"). [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 2:19 pm
Outside of the beltway, people all over the United States are taking to the streets to demand fundamental change. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:42 am
A new decision from the United States District Court in Illinois, Miracle-Pond, et al. v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 8:27 am
LLC v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 11:30 am
If the President knowingly accepted prohibited emoluments from the States or the United States, then he could be impeached. [read post]
17 May 2020, 8:14 am
The connection with accounting remained, but reduced to a dimension increasingly rejected by Western society as abhorrent to its ideals emerging from the Enlightenment (famously in Dostoevsky, Brothers Karamazov (Constance Garnett, trans.: NY Lowell Press) Bk V, Chp V, The Grand Inquisitor)). [read post]
15 May 2020, 4:30 am
("The people do not vote for the 'Officers of the United States.'"); United States v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:26 pm
“When somebody’s the president of the United States, the authority is total,” Trump said. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am
Here, the government may still be liable for Theresa=s negligence under the FTCA (28 USC 1346 [b]; Haskin, 569 Fed Appx 12; Esgrance v United States, US Dist Ct, SD NY, 17 Civ 8352, Oetken, J., 2018; Jappa v PJR Const. [read post]
7 May 2020, 12:24 pm
United States, Welch v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 11:19 am
(HC 2109/20 Ben Meir v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 6:42 am
Act of 1701), most of the American colonies, enacted statutes that required office holders to swear an oath affirming some form of Protestant Christianity. [read post]
3 May 2020, 7:58 pm
Interested parties will litigate to ensure the United States Postal Service postmarks more ballots. [read post]
1 May 2020, 8:29 am
Id. at 18; Holder, 561 U.S. at 27-28; United States v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:14 am
A letter to the plaintiff advised her not to alter her current employment status until the contingencies had been successfully completed and that the offer was contingent upon proof of identity and eligibility to work in the United States. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON TAGNETICS, INC., Appellant, v. [read post]