Search for: "Howe v. Tax Commission"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,372
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2024, 7:55 am
The IRA gives projects in energy-impacted communities bonus tax credits. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:01 am
Stakeholders have long asserted that ambiguous or confusing instructions on how to make these selections lead to unwarranted funding denials by USAC. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 5:30 am
One candidate for causation is the Federal Trade Commission's first set of guidelines restricting health claims in cigarette advertising. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 11:47 am
Krishna Murthi v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:46 am
Second Circuit Finally Delivers an Opinion on PSLRA's Forward-Looking Information Safe Harbor Recently, the Second Circuit issued its first opinion analyzing the PSLRA's safe harbor for forward-looking statements in Slayton v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
The state is supposed to roll out a regulatory scheme run by a Cannabis Control Commission in 2017, start accepting applications for marijuana sellers by October 2017, and start permitting licensed sales by January 1, 2018, on which a 3.75% tax would be imposed. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 4:46 am
All of the recent legislation that has provided additional funding sources and statutory authority for the Agency - FDAMA, user fees, and FDAAA - have been pushed by industry and either ignored, or actively sabotaged, by the other side of the "v".Industry even agreed to tax itself for the benefit of the FDA (something we've never seen lawyers do - the bar vehemently opposes any taxes on legal fees), but still the plaintiffs' side carps. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
The state is supposed to roll out a regulatory scheme run by a Cannabis Control Commission in 2017, start accepting applications for marijuana sellers by October 2017, and start permitting licensed sales by January 1, 2018, on which a 3.75% tax would be imposed. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 12:05 pm
The ultimate questions in the wake of Lucia v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 5:27 pm
[v] This does not always mean equal fence length. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 5:27 pm
[v] This does not always mean equal fence length. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 2:00 am
Pennsylvania, et al. and Trump v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 2:00 am
Pennsylvania, et al. and Trump v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 8:18 am
Vierrath explained how the system in Germany worked, something that appeared far more complex than anyone presumed. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:06 pm
But the Court returned to a strict interpretation of the ban in 1962, in the case of Enochs v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 9:30 pm
” Finally, in King v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
I’ve linked dockets of a rescheduled case and a relisted case so you can see how both work. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 1:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 9:03 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in West Virginia v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 4:49 pm
The statement of facts filed by Bragg’s office alongside the indictment provides far more detail about how the district attorney views the case. [read post]
