Search for: "I D B Board" Results 761 - 780 of 3,951
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2020, 9:23 am by Arina Shulga
  Since I have just finished teaching this to students at Fordham Law's Entrepreneurial Law class, I thought I would share some of the calculations here with you. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am by Jack Sharman
Reading Time: 23 minutes Balancing act.My partners Brandon Essig, Jeff Doss, and I recently shared thoughts concerning public corruption trials. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 12:02 pm by Patricia Hughes
In my November 3rd Slaw post on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Fraser, I considered the division on the Court relating to the interpretation of section 15(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 9:29 am by Eugene Volokh
Since free speech about legal cases and the lawyers who litigate them is likely important to many readers of blogs such as ours, I thought I'd note this latest development. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 3:38 am
Under Lexmark, the Board must assess "whether the party demonstrated (i) an interest falling within the zone of interests protected by the statute and (ii) proximate causation. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 12:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As I have also previously noted, corruption-related lawsuits frequently are filed, but frequently are unsuccessful. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 5:43 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
” In actuality, E/C’s “intervening trauma” defense is a preexisting condition defense, albeit one without a factual basis, under § 440.09(1)(b), Fla. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 9:36 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
” In actuality, E/C’s “intervening trauma” defense is a preexisting condition defense, albeit one without a factual basis, under § 440.09(1)(b), Fla. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 6:53 am by Joy
Spence laid out the following factors when considering the best interests of the child for schooling purposes: i. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 2:20 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The target’s Ds & Os can be sued for ’34 Act violations, specifically Section 10(b) and Section 14(a) violations, as well as for ’33 Act violations if they are named in the registration statement as about to join the combined entity’s board. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” “I’ve just shown you that there was full Reg D compliance for Mr. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 3:31 am by Peter Mahler
First, they breached the Operating Agreement when they attempted to install a CEO without board approval as their right to designate a CEO in Section 7.10(b) is subject to the other provisions of the Operating Agreement (including, Section 7.10(a) which indicates that officers must be approved by the Board). [read post]
Gardner, a New Hampshire state court refused to enjoin the state’s restrictions on ballot collection and delivery, concluding that it was “not persuaded” that the law “even impose[d] a burden on a voter. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 2:13 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The complaint alleges that the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. [read post]