Search for: "IN RE: B.R."
Results 761 - 780
of 1,121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2009, 7:14 am
In re Mirant, 354 B.R. at 128 (emphasis added). [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 10:11 pm
In accord with the Massachusetts case of In re Lyons, 355 B.R. 387 (Bankr. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 11:34 am
Brief by my law clerk Roksana Moradi In re Werts, --- B.R. ----, 2009 WL 2563468 (Bkrtcy.D.Kan.) [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 6:55 am
” Thus, the court in In re Mann, 410 B.R. 43, 49 (Bkr. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 11:07 pm
(In re Chateaugay), 213 B.R. 633, 638 (S.D.N.Y. 1997), and Pittsburgh Food & Bev., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 2:08 pm
S.D.N.Y. 2005) and In re Morgansen's Ltd., 302 B.R. 784 (Bankr. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 4:26 am
Seidler (In re Swift), 198 B.R. 927 (Bankr. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 7:23 am
But see In re UAL Corp., 291 B.R. 121 (Bankr. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 7:08 am
I could go on, but I quickly returned to vacation mode, as I will here.Heading to Sonoma proper, we went to B.R. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:37 pm
In re Canonigo, 276 B.R. 257 (Bktcy. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 10:45 am
See also In re Brenegan, 123 B.R. 12, 13 (D. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 4:15 am
The leading federal case on the question, In re Asia Global Crossing, Ltd, 322 B.R. 247 (S.D.N.Y. 2005), lays out several factors to consider: - Does the company maintain a policy banning personal or other objectionable use; - Does the company monitor the use of the employee's computer or e-mail; - Do third parties have a right of access to the computer or e-mails; and - Did the company notify the employee, or was the employee aware, of the use and monitoring policies? … [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 9:52 am
Brief by UWLA Law Student, Sara Hussain: In re Washington Mutual, Inc., 408 B.R. 45 (Bkrtcy D. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 8:36 am
Ries (In re Carpenter), 408 B.R. 244 (8th Cir.BAP (Minn.)) [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 10:00 pm
These articles explained that assets may be recovered by clawback which can force an investor to return presumptively fraudulent profits, as mentioned by In re: Bayou Group LLC, et. al., 396 B.R. 810 (Bkrtcy S.D.N.Y. 2008). [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 3:04 am
See In re Twin Labs. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 3:55 am
In re SPI Commc'ns & Mktg., Inc., 114 B.R. at 18. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 12:00 am
In re Boyd, 378 B.R. 81 (Bankr. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 5:46 pm
Pa. 2003) passim In re Ormet Corp., 324 B.R. 645 (Bankr. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 8:04 am
In re Smith, --- B.R. ---, 2009 WL ------------ (unpublished to date)(Bankr. [read post]
