Search for: "INFORRM"
Results 761 - 780
of 950
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2011, 5:53 pm
Lord Neuberger’s committee on super injunctions, as mentioned in this week’s Inforrm round up, is due to report by the end of April. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 4:13 am
Inforrm encourages readers to make submissions to the Committee and to send copies to us – to be included on a special section of the blog – see the right hand column. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 5:05 pm
(discussed here on Inforrm). [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:12 am
Inforrm’s Blog was of the opinion that the announcement was, amongst other things, a success for the media campaign against the current regime of defamation and privacy conditional fee agreements (CFAs). [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 5:02 pm
Perhaps the most interesting feature of this judgment from our point of view is the first reference to Inforrm in a High Court judgment (see [24]). [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:49 pm
This is a Media and Information Law Update covering the last week prepared by the Legal Information Team at Matrix Chambers, which they have kindly agreed to make available to readers of Inforrm. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:04 am
His detailed response to the draft bill is published in two parts, here and here, on the Inforrm blog. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 7:44 am
There is also Inforrm blog post. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 11:00 pm
This post first appeared on the Inforrm Blog and is reproduced with permission and thanks. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 2:29 am
A good starting point for this conversation is the legal bloggers, who generally speaking seek to bring the public closer to the legal system through modern technology, and have been predictably enthusiastic about Neuberger’s speech: see Meeja Law, UKSC Blog, Halsbury’s Law Exchange, Inforrm, ObiterJ, Charon QC and the UCL Constitutional Unit which called my own response “almost gushing“. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 11:40 pm
Whilst David Allen Green, a media defence lawyer writing in the New Statesman argues that the bill is a great step forward, Inforrm, the international forum for responsible media blog, concludes that the bill is neither radical nor wide-ranging. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:05 pm
The draft Defamation Bill has provoked a range of responses, including those of Dominic Crossley and my colleague Alastair Mullis published here on Inforrm. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 8:06 am
Roy Greenslade gives three cheers for the Bill, the Libel Reform Campaign has given the Bill a cautious welcome, Legal Week comments that it contains few surprises and little radicalism, and Inforrm’s blog concludes that it is mostly harmless. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 3:24 am
As Inforrm’s blog points out, he is very much alive to concerns that they have, as Professor Zuckerman has put it, developed into a form of entirely secret form of procedure. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 5:05 pm
There is an Inforrm blog post about the case here. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:13 am
Inforrm, Index on Censorship ) as well as reports in the press (Nick Clegg’s piece in the Guardian, Joshua Rozenberg (also Guardian), Christopher Hope (focusing on ‘libel tourism’) in the Telegraph. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 2:25 am
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Related reading: Inforrm blog: Does anyone gain from the Libel Reform Bill? [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 2:31 am
US Law and Media News Once again, this will be the subject of a separate post From the Blogs The Strasbourg Observers blog has two posts of interest to Inforrm readers. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 8:25 am
By way of background, Alex Bailin QC has posted an excellent comment piece on the Inforrm blog. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 5:04 am
There is an Inforrm case comment. [read post]
