Search for: "In Re Anderson" Results 761 - 780 of 2,707
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Anderson & Karen Gatsis Anderson Public Interest Law Fellowship Public Interest Attorney Loan Repayment Assistance Program Indiana Richard M. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 1:27 pm by MBettman
At the re-sentencing, the trial court discussed the disparity between Boyd’s and Anderson’s sentences, saying that although they were equally culpable, Boyd got a lesser sentence for cooperating with the state, admitting his misconduct, and for his willingness to testify against Anderson if necessary. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 2:01 pm
--> This post examines a recent opinion the Court of Appeals of Minnesota issued in a civil case:  Polinsky v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 4:49 am by SHG
If the connection fails to grab you as obvious, then you’re just not woke enough to get it. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 5:20 am by Rebecca Tushnet
While injunctive relief was still possible, the court decertified the Rule 23(b)(3) class and sought additional briefing on whether the class would be re-certifiable under Rule 23(b)(2). [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am by Jack Sharman
We are heading into what appears to be a summer of investigations along the Potomac, some of them in the House and Senate. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:51 am by Derek T. Muller
My colleague Rob Anderson and I have posted a draft article, The High Cost of Lowering the Bar on SSRN. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:27 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Last night, CNN ran a lengthy interview I did with Anderson Cooper, in which I made a bald statement. [read post]
16 May 2017, 8:03 am by Dennis Crouch
These include programs for making sure we’re getting the most relevant prior art before our examiners as early as possible by making prior art cited in our PTAB proceedings available to examiners handling related applications, and transitioning all our examiners from the decades old, antiquated U.S. [read post]
7 May 2017, 4:28 am by SHG
Let’s do away with cross-examination because it could re-traumatize the victim. [read post]