Search for: "In Re Opinion of the Justices."
Results 761 - 780
of 14,245
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2011, 7:55 pm
Madam Justice Gerow agreed with Brian Thomasson’s submissions and ordered that Alexander Thomasson be passed over, but reserved his right to be added in the future after any enquiries into the transfer of land to him were completed. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 12:38 pm
Chief Justice Ronald George announced a week ago that he would not be seeking re-election this November (California Supreme Court justices stand for a yes or no re-election vote every twelve years). [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
I fully recognize that this is not a representative sampling of public opinion. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 7:56 am
James Meyers et al, a 7-page opinion, Justice Dickson writes:We reaffirm the Indiana employment at will doctrine and decline to find exception for alleged wrongful discharge in retaliation for the assertion of a claim for unpaid wages.Part 1 of the opinion reviews the history of the employment at will doctrine in Indiana and concludes:In Morgan Drive Away, we emphasize that the "employment at will doctrine has stead-fastly been recognized and enforced as the public… [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 12:41 pm
The retirees consented to all the justices participating. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 1:18 pm
I’ll write about Justice Thomas’s opinion later; today I’ll talk about Justice Alito’s opinion. [read post]
24 May 2007, 4:25 pm
I agree with the majority opinion (written by Justice Bamattre-Manoukian) in this one. [read post]
7 May 2020, 1:24 pm
” No other justice joined this opinion. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:03 am
Among the more prominent of those opinions were Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 10:34 am
The Supreme Court is scheduled to release opinions tomorrow. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 2:33 pm
Which, of course, is what you'd fully expect 'em to do if the math error was in her favor.Regardless, in the end, the Court of Appeal affirms, and (belatedly) publishes the opinion to boot. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 2:11 pm
One of the things I like most about the California Supreme Court is that, busy as they are, they're not too busy to occasionally engage in pure error review; e.g., to grant review of the occasional unpublished opinion that's really wrong. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 3:30 am
The country is re-opening. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 5:55 pm
Babe: You're talking to me? [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 11:36 am
Writing for the court, Justice Samuel A. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 11:19 am
Though two Justices tried hard in separate opinions to ease the impact of the Supreme Court's rulng Monday on high-speed police chases, the fact remains that the main opinion had the unqualified support of six Justices and did lay down a hard-and-fast constitutional rule. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
See also, In re Lindsey (D.C. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 10:22 pm
: A senior Justice Department official said Tuesday that "99.8 percent" of the department's work with President-elect Barack Obama's transition team has gone smoothly. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:35 pm
Even if you're not persuaded by that reasoning. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 10:28 am
” Additionally, the court notes that, under In re: Sealed Case, a lower court’s determination will be reversed only if there is abuse of discretion. [read post]
