Search for: "In re: Peer Review Action."
Results 761 - 780
of 926
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2010, 9:58 pm
And when they're wrong, they're very very wrong - averaging an unnecessary expense of nearly $1.5 million one time out of four. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:15 am
And while you're waiting, pull a weed. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 9:28 pm
We, too, at the Department of Justice have met the crisis with a strong response: the Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement Action Team, or HEAT. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
(Maier & Maier) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Defendant may defeat false patent marking claim by showing no intent to deceive: Pequignot v Solo Cup Company (IP Spotlight) (Patently-O) (GRAY on Claims) (Florida IP) (Inventive Step) Two Strykes and you're out - Fed. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 4:15 am
The peer review process is so unfair to the researchers that alternative models were explored recently in, ironically, a Nature Chemical Biology editorial. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:54 am
They're also bad for your bones. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:46 am
A report should be made to the bar disciplinary agency unless some other agency, such as a peer review agency, is more appropriate in the circumstances. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 2:30 am
The peer review process, while generally delegating responsibility to the private sector to monitor the professional conduct of physicians, establishes minimum protections for physicians subject to adverse action in the peer review system. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 2:30 am
The peer review process, while generally delegating responsibility to the private sector to monitor the professional conduct of physicians, establishes minimum protections for physicians subject to adverse action in the peer review system. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Vol. 2, No. 15, June 5, 2010 The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Vol. 2, No. 15, June 5, 2010 The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
31 May 2010, 3:11 am
Power Ventures (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Whitney Harper - Peer to peer defendant seeks Supreme Court review of ‘innocent infringer’ ruling (Copyrights & Campaigns) Worldwide Film Entertainment - Anonymous accused Bittorrent user moves to quash subpoena using real name: Worldwide Film Entertainment, LLC v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 2:38 pm
If you're a New Yorker, please join us! [read post]
25 May 2010, 2:16 pm
Nor, apparently, do the NEJM editors or peer reviewers, or else they wouldn’t have published this piece. [read post]
22 May 2010, 9:33 am
Such required peer review might have benefits beyond simply preventing the rare case of fraud. [read post]
18 May 2010, 2:02 pm
The end goal here is a 360 degree performance review — both self-assessment, by management and one’s peers and, if necessary, a performance improvement plan. [read post]
14 May 2010, 12:07 am
With a copyright bill only weeks away, thousands of Canadians are again speaking out for a fair, balanced approach. [read post]
12 May 2010, 7:00 am
What does it say on Don’s last couple of employee reviews, I can’t help but wonder? [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
“Confirmation Messes, Old and New,” University of Chicago Law Review (book review). [read post]
7 May 2010, 11:11 am
§ 146 action, this court "review[s] the district court's factual findings for clear error and its conclusions of law de novo . . . . [read post]
