Search for: "In re Application of Wells"
Results 761 - 780
of 22,306
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2015, 9:42 am
Thus, should an application under examination drop out of the PACE programme, it will not be possible to re-enter the accelerated procedure. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 9:44 am
Most often, they’re merely mistaken, or innocently using the symbol improperly. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 9:44 am
Most often, they’re merely mistaken, or innocently using the symbol improperly. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 11:02 am
Well, the rationale is equally applicable to these types of policies in the private sector. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 11:30 am
The person or team developing the best application will receive $21,000 from ASPR as well as a $1,000 travel stipend to attend an event announcing the winner. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 6:13 am
She looks great on paper and interviewed well. [read post]
10 May 2007, 10:01 pm
In re Ayurvedic Concepts, Ltd., Serial No. 78154263 (April 18, 2007) [not precedential].The Examining Attorney relied on dictionary definitions for the word individually as well as in combination. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 2:01 pm
Well, I *think* I have a solution! [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 11:30 am
I had two years of applicable Engineering Co-Op experience as well as being a Military Veteran. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:07 am
Well, it depends on which Social Security disability program you're going to apply for: Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) or Supplemental Security Income (SSI). [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 6:34 am
On February 16, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in In re Messer, Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-510. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 7:05 am
Because the “mark uses ‘fur free’ in place of ‘faux’ to let consumers know that” the Applicant’s goods do not contain animal fur, she found that “[b]oth the individual components of Applicant’s mark, as well as the composite mark, describe Applicant’s goods. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 3:28 am
In re Doofood, Serial No. 87370003 (September 4, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc A. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 2:40 am
Within the context of Applicant’s Class 9 and Class 10 goods, purchasers will immediately recognize that the word ATHLETE in Applicant’s mark designates the person wearing Applicant’s “monitoring device and system … comprised of electronic sensors”, and that INTELLIGENCE refers to the gathering of information measuring an individual athlete’s biometrics, positioning and speed, physiology as well as the magnitude and… [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:20 am
Given the EEOC’s position about the illegality of certain biometric testing programs, as well as the agency’s apparent interest in challenging them, all employers should review their own health-screening incentive programs to make sure they are in line with applicable laws. [read post]
19 May 2007, 11:01 pm
Even the DOJ Honors Program under Ashcroft screened applicants based on ideology. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 4:45 am
His treating physicians concluded that he needed to be institutionalized for his own well-being. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 6:03 am
While that’s all well and good, it may not always be practical or applicable. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 5:00 am
In re La Peregrina Limited, Serial No. 78676199 (March 14, 2008) [precedential].Applicant stated in its application that the English translation of its mark is THE PILGRIM. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 12:03 pm
The opinion analyzes each technique based on three ways that data can be re-identified: the ability to single out individuals after the anonymization technique has been applied; the linkability of the anonymized data sets to other data sets; and finally the ability of the data sets to resist inference attacks after application of the anonymization technique. [read post]