Search for: "In re Graham"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,910
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2018, 8:27 am
By contrast, Dawn Adesreports on the careful, and rather sophisticated, legal arrangements that Martha Graham’s estate put together regarding the use of her work following her death, relying on trusts, licensing agreements and donations governed by tightly-written contracts (in ‘Thing 000955 (Martha Graham’s Choreographies)’, pp. 303-323, Chapter 20*). [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 3:19 pm
Ultimately, while the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing offered worrying posturing on the necessity of backdoors, we’re hopeful that Congress will recognize what a dangerous idea legislation would be in this area. [read post]
26 May 2009, 10:15 pm
Lindsay Graham quote below.GOP Argument 2. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:40 am
Well, they’re nothing compared to the reactions to the Justice Department’s White Paper on the lethal targeting of a “U.S. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 8:39 am
While they’re busy crying over spilled milk, you can be the one people will be turning to when they’re in need. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 5:21 am
Oh wait, we’re not invited there either. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 10:27 pm
Maybe we're just seeing a fist of steel encased in a velvet glove. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 11:39 am
“We’re in a death spiral with Hispanic voters because of rhetoric around immigration,” Mr Graham said this week. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 1:54 pm
"---Franklin Graham, as told to Jack Handy [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 8:27 pm
From a large pool of nominations drawn from a multitude of Australian blogs, our committee chose forty posts; these Graham Young kindly agreed to re-post on On Line Opinion, where they were published over the course of January. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 7:58 am
Lindsey Graham (R-SC) to Sotomayor: "Unless you have a complete meltdown, you're going to be confirmed. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 7:50 am
I think that they're in good faith with what they're trying to do. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 2:58 am
See id.; In re Piasecki, 745 F.2d 1468, 1471, 223 U.S.P.Q. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 3:53 am
Graham v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 5:45 pm
The Court in In re Graham, 21 B.R. 235, 238-39 (Bankr. [read post]
27 May 2008, 6:12 pm
Graham v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 4:01 am
Laura Graham, Director of Legal Analysis, Writing, and Research and Professor of Legal Writing, Wake Forest University School of Law Excerpt: Abstract from SSRN and Part 5: Reaching and Teaching Generation Z Law Students [Footnotes omitted; they can be found in the original via the link above.] [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 1:09 pm
Christine Grahame is here. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 11:51 pm
If you're a believer in precedent, you look at what the Court said in 2005, in Roper v. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 8:03 pm
The process of political integration--of the viability of hetero-ethnic-religious states--once thought settled after 1945, has re-emerged in both liberal democratic and authoritarian states; it has emerged in both developed and developing states. [read post]
