Search for: "In re Perry"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,970
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2016, 10:03 am
Rick Perry vetoed legislation in 2001 to limit such arrests, but Republican state Sen. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 7:56 am
"We're very tough on crime in Texas," he said. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 7:52 am
We're not trying to arrest somebody. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 10:46 am
Going back and re-punishing those convicted over 50 years ago of some crime? [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 7:08 pm
"They do this, and they're not held accountable. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 9:00 am
They’re unstable and change over time: true crime podcasts. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 2:38 pm
” Austinist: “If you vote for Rick Perry, and you're not a Christian, you're going to hell. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 6:09 am
You’re in it right now. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 7:20 am
Perry has since r [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 6:57 am
Legal professionals meticulously examine the evidence, re-interview witnesses, and analyze every aspect of the case to unravel the truth that may have been overlooked during the original trial. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:59 am
Look, as I've noted here many times (and as guys like Perry and Boudreaux deftly show on an almost-daily basis) there are plenty of great economic and historical arguments in support of free exchange among individuals, but when you get down to it, they're kinda beside the point. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 3:18 pm
Interviewer: “Aside from the public record and all the evidence you put on during trial…is there any other reason why you’re so confident that the right decision was made? [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 3:18 pm
They're just "supposed" experts (including the one chosen by the state's Forensic Science Commission to study the evidence and report back, but you can't expect much of the Commission - after all Perry just replaced several members.)Anyway, the experts don't count. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 11:01 am
Legal professionals meticulously examine the evidence, re-interview witnesses, and analyze every aspect of the case to unravel the truth that may have been overlooked during the original trial. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
Today we’re not.While we don’t claim to know much about the specifics, we’re aware that the FDA is going (or maybe already has) to lower the classification of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (that mouthful is thankfully abbreviated "PTCA") catheters from Class III to Class II. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 7:21 pm
Patent No. 6,185,683, in view of Perry, U.S. [read post]
3 May 2014, 10:24 pm
He told the Global News "Whether you feel like you’re safe on the resort, as soon as you step off the resort you’re in a war zone. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 7:09 am
"You're trying to get these cases dismissed and that's not justice. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 1:05 pm
Perhaps courts can't base (or, at least, publicly admit that their basing their decisions) exclusively on "possible effects," but, going back to Marbury and foreword to the embarrassing decision a couple of years ago finding a lack of standing in Perry v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 2:50 pm
“They’re the ones whose blame is to be feared. [read post]
