Search for: "In the Matter of: Graham"
Results 761 - 780
of 2,071
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2009, 5:04 am
., "civil" and "criminal") matters, non-adjudicative (administrative, congressional) ones, and the news media. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
” The Justice Department may, therefore, be arguing that Chief Judge Howell did not issue a final decision in the matter and so the circuit court lacks statutory jurisdiction to review the action. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 2:52 am
Graham J had posed the question[59]: “Would the notional research group at the relevant date, in all the circumstances, which include a knowledge of all the relevant prior art and of the facts of the nature and success of chlorpromazine, directly be led as a matter of course to try the -CF3 substitution in the ’2? [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:01 pm
The Judge noted that the idea that comment or opinion should always be a matter of public interest “has always been said to be an essential feature of the defence”. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:11 am
For one thing, his camera-seeking actions on and after the 9/11 attacks were essentially a matter of having the spotlight ceded to him by an AWOL President Bush. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 3:40 pm
And, like Deason, Lindsey Graham, Jenna Ellis, and Brian Kemp before him, he contended that the special purpose grand jury’s investigation is a civil inquiry. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 3:31 pm
In Graham v. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 8:00 am
No matter how often you write there is always room for improvement. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 3:31 pm
In Graham v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 5:48 am
The “Billy Graham Rule” was one of propriety, of how men interacted with women. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 4:56 pm
“Apple presented compelling secondary considerations evidence that may have rebutted even a strong showing under the first three Graham factors [...]. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 9:00 am
See Graham v. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 12:23 pm
Lindsey Graham, Thom Tillis, and Jeff Flake—joined the committee’s Democrats in voting for the bill. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 9:10 am
Foremost, the Supreme Court case relied upon is Graham v. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 4:30 am
D., & Graham, S. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 6:45 am
” Should legislation move forward to eliminate the requirement for inventive application, we will have to learn if it in fact is a requirement of constitutional stature in granting authority to “inventors for their discoveries” (or is simply like the dicta in Graham v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 10:44 am
This defense of libertarianism was quite prominent in the works of such nineteenth century Jacksonians as William Leggett and, later, William Graham Sumner. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 8:11 am
This Kat would doubtless have kept tucking it away into the furthest recesses of his "things to do if only I had the time", had it not been for a prompt prompt [the first 'prompt' being an adjective, the second a noun] from Graham Burnett-Hall (Marks & Clerk), who earns a katpat for his pains. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:45 am
The IPKat has received quite a few emails from readers wondering whether this blog will touch upon the matter. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 8:51 am
Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), and Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) introduced the Lawful Access To Encrypted Data Act. [read post]
