Search for: "J. Hartely" Results 761 - 780 of 916
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
[I'm working on a draft article called When Are Lies Constitutionally Protected? [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:03 pm by Bill Marler
On August 15, 2016, the Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH) identified raw scallops served at Genki Sushi restaurants on Oahu and Kauai as a likely source of an ongoing hepatitis A outbreak. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 5:55 pm
Maintained by two editors – Wendy Johnson Lario and Kristine J. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Kysar.Kysar, Douglas A.New Haven [Conn.] : Yale University Press, c2010Environmental LawGE180 .E637 2010Environmental protection policy and experience in the U.S. and China's western regions / edited by Sujian Guo, Joel J. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 8:12 am
 Pix Credit Museum Panama City, Panama For those who might have an interest, I have posted for comment or reaction, a discussion draft of my essay, Overcoming the Human, Rights, and the State in Human Rights. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 7:49 pm
April 2004 CanadaAbstractAlthough some studies suggest positive effects of treatment for sexual offenders, most studies have been hampered by the unknown influence of selective attrition (e.g., volunteers and drop-outs). [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
             Some readers may be surprised to discover that his judicial hero, in many ways, is not, say, William J. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 4:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Am., Inc., 989 F.2d 1512, 1516 (9th Cir. 1993) (Kozinski, J., dissenting from denial of rehearing en banc), and the Rogers test applies when this expense is most significant. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm by Neil Siegel
In rejecting the applicability of the political question doctrine, Justice Brennan wrote in part for the majority that “[j]udicial standards under the Equal Protection Clause are well developed and familiar, and it has been open to courts since the enactment of the Fourteenth Amendment to determine, if on the particular facts they must, that a discrimination reflects no policy, but simply arbitrary and capricious action. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
(Readers of the Hart/Fuller debate will need no persuasion on that score). [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:54 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Applicable Legal Standards  Official description: Actual and “red flag” knowledge requirements; financial benefit/right to control test; willful blindness; repeat infringers; good-faith requirements and Lenz; misrepresentation; fair use; use of representative lists; availability of injunctive relief; use of subpoenas; role of “standard technical measures”; and other pertinent issues. [read post]