Search for: "JONES DOES 1-10" Results 761 - 780 of 1,196
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm by John Elwood
City of New York argue essentially that (1) the program’s restriction on terminating tenants at the end of the lease term, except for reasons outside the owner’s control, constitutes a per se physical taking; and (2) the law so restricts owners’ property as to constitute a regulatory taking. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 5:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
A summary of existing FTTs can be found in Table 1. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
The trial judge, however, neverreached this conflict in the facts, because he ruled strictly on legal grounds: namely (1)that section 2923.5 does not provide for a private right of action and (2) section 2923.5 ispreempted by federal law. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 5:08 am by Shea Denning
Further, the trial court prohibited the bail agent from becoming “surety on any bail bond in Jones County until” it satisfied the judgment. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:53 pm
Jones (contributing author) provides guidance on what clients and experienced attorneys expect from new associates. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:00 am by John Day
 Thus, a ‘disinterested witness’ does not stand to gain a benefit or suffer a detriment as a result of the outcome of the case, Jones v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 9:32 am by William Ford, Tia Sewell
The subcommittee will hear testimony from Beth Strano, asylum seekers and families coordinator at the International Rescue Committee; Ruben Garcia, director of Annunciation House; and Joshua Jones, senior fellow at the Texas Public Policy Foundation. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 12:49 pm by Kevin LaCroix
A proxy for damages claimed by plaintiffs may not be an accurate determinant in predicting settlement outcomes because it does not apply the court-accepted event study methodology to effectively compute potential damages per share. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, July 18, 2008 In re Sims, No. 06-0644 In an inmate's 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action alleging excessive force, inmate's petition for writ of mandamus challenging an order requiring him to produce his mental health records is granted because: 1) a plaintiff does not forfeit the psychotherapist-patient privilege merely by asserting a claim for injuries that do not include emotional damage, or by stating that he suffers from depression or… [read post]