Search for: "Jeffrey A. Held" Results 761 - 780 of 2,939
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2014, 7:00 am by Tara
  The New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, agreed that Jeffrey should be able to rescind the contract and held that as to the purported ghosts haunting the home, the seller “is estopped to deny their existence and, as a matter of law, the house is haunted. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 6:00 am by Tara Mospan
  The New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, agreed that Jeffrey should be able to rescind the contract and held that as to the purported ghosts haunting the home, the seller “is estopped to deny their existence and, as a matter of law, the house is haunted. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 6:00 am by Tara
  The New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, agreed that Jeffrey should be able to rescind the contract and held that as to the purported ghosts haunting the home, the seller “is estopped to deny their existence and, as a matter of law, the house is haunted. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 8:08 am by Andrew Hamm
Virginia, in which the justices held that the automobile exception to the warrant requirement does not permit a warrantless search of a motorcycle parked in the driveway of a home. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:48 pm
By finding the plaintiff’s view of the events implausible, or less plausible than the possibility that the defendants acted unilaterally, the lower court improperly made factual findings, it was held. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 10:05 am by Ben Rubin
Last year I saw Win Win, a movie starring Paul Giamatti, Amy Ryan and Jeffrey Tambor. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 3:18 am
The Court has long held that in the context of Wyo. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 3:05 pm
Co., 322 F.3d 942, 2003-1 Trade Cases ¶73,971) and held that the FTAIA was an element of the Sherman Act. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:36 pm by Christine Hurt
  Was there a presumption of juror prejudice in Houston at the time of Jeffrey Skilling's trial, and if so, was that prejudice eliminate by an effective voir dire? [read post]
The court held RECO had failed to prove a three-year noncompete agreement wouldn’t impose undue hardship on Wilson. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 10:42 pm by Tom Stenzel
The Act provides for a concept of “strict liability,” meaning that corporate executives can be held criminally responsible for a case of foodborne illness, without regard to negligence or intent. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 4:08 am by SHG
Putative victims of Jeffrey Epstein rose at the hearing and addressed the court. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
Austin has held a vice president’s post at the Colorado poultry company since 2007. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:45 am by John Floyd
  He is currently being held without bail, although he is in the process of appealing the decision. [read post]