Search for: "John Does 1-10, Defendants" Results 761 - 780 of 2,043
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2018, 9:17 pm by Jim Sedor
A registration website will be available August 1, with lobbyists expected to comply with the policy starting September 1, said Citizens President Barry Gilway. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:15 am by John Elwood
John Elwood provides an unadorned roll of Monday’s relists. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 6:20 am by Rachel Bercovitz
” Rebecca Balebako and John Davis of RAND will address U.S. and European law regarding data privacy. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, since the retainer agreement executed between plaintiffs and the Aboulafia firm, which constitutes “documentary evidence” within the purview of that section (see generally Fontanetta v John Doe 1, 73 AD3d 78, 84-85 [2d Dept 2010]), clearly limits the firm’s representation only to commencing a property damage claim against Marine. [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:41 am by John Elwood
John Elwood (finally) reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
23 May 2018, 8:00 am
Ironically, so did Governor John Kasich, who signed Ohio’s rigged map into law and is a named defendant in our suit. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am by John Elwood
John Elwood (finally) reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
The Ninth Circuit sitting en banc held that an employee’s prior salary does not constitute a “factor other than sex” upon which a wage differential may be based under the Equal Pay Act& [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 10:40 am by Chinmayi Sharma
It points to defendant Stone’s secret communications with GRU Operative #1, the original purveyor of DNC documents, and Stone’s bragging about ties to Assange. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:32 am by William Ford
” Discussants include John Lee and Bonnie Glaser. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am by Eugene Volokh
Here then is the brief: [* * *] Summary of Argument An anti-libel injunction, enforceable through the threat of prosecution for criminal contempt, is like a miniature criminal libel law—just for a particular defendant, and just for particular statements about a particular plaintiff.[1] That is its virtue. [read post]