Search for: "John Does 1-5"
Results 761 - 780
of 4,999
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2015, 2:10 pm
Bernardin, supra.The opinion then went on to explain that[o]n May 15, 2013, Sewell filed a separate suit against Bernardin's wife, Tara Bernardin, and `John Does # 1–5,’ apparently believing that Tara Bernardin and others unknown to her had gained access to her Internet accounts. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 9:40 am
Had the jury been aware of the fact: (1) that RH was let out on bail in order to find 'John Doe' and 'Richard Roe;' (2) that he then led the police to the PKS brothers; and (3) that after they had been arrested he was sentenced as a second felony offender to a term of only 2 1/2 to 5 years, the jury might have evaluated differently his identification of the defendant and his brother at the trial. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:46 am
Section 2(e)(1) - Mere Descriptiveness: TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Appeals from Section 2(e)(1) Mere Descriptiveness Refusals Turn Out? [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 3:38 am
Among the more interesting ones, the Board considered the registrability of a rare “motion mark,” concluding that the gripping, in-and-out movement of the jaws of a hand tool was functional under Section 2(e)(5). [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 3:46 am
TTAB Posts April 2013 Hearing ScheduleText Copyright John L. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 6:41 am
Id.; Brian Hieggelke, The Necessity of Evolution at Newcity, Newcity, Feb.1, 2017, at 5. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 11:24 am
But he said he didn't know he was listed as the "sole organizer" of MCGIP, a firm that has sued numerous John Doe defendants for pornographic copyright infringement. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 12:14 pm
The court allowed Doe's sex discrimination against UCLA to go forward: Doe's [Complaint] divides his relevant allegations into three categories: (1) allegations of external pressures, (2) allegations of an internal pattern and practice of bias, and (3) allegations of specific instances of bias in his case. [read post]
12 May 2010, 2:24 am
Forum May 5, 2010). [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 7:45 am
Supreme Court opinions in argued cases: The Court today issued two opinions in argued cases. 1. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 7:50 am
Arizona bankruptcy attorney John Skiba can be reached at (480) 648-8975. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 5:09 am
5. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 4:13 pm
Does the market really need or want it? [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:15 am
5. [read post]
15 May 2023, 10:30 am
Frank Pommersheim, does not speak or understand English. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
§§1–1–113(1), 1–4–1101(1), 1–4–1201, 1–4–1203(2)(a), 1–4–1204 (2023).After a five-day trial, the state District Court found thatformer President Trump had “engaged in insurrection”within the meaning of Section 3, but nonetheless denied therespondents’ petition. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 11:06 am
Related posts:United States Signs Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements On 19th January, the outgoing State Department Legal Advisor, John...Articles on Rome II and Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements The current issue (Vol. 73, No. 1, January 2009) of...Proposal EC on Signing of Hague Choice of Court Convention On 5 September 2008 a Proposal for a Council Decision... [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
And here is the second decision that was upheld, Magistrate Judge John Anderson's decision in Doe v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 2:27 pm
In light of this precedent, the enactment of a Federal law is the best way to ensure that claims to Nazi-confiscated art are adjudicated on their merits.3.PurposesThe purposes of this Act are the following:(1)To ensure that laws governing claims to Nazi-confiscated art further United States policy as set forth in the Washington Conference Principles on Nazi-Confiscated Art, the Holocaust Victims Redress Act, and the Terezin Declaration.(2)To ensure that claims to artwork stolen or… [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 2:27 pm
In light of this precedent, the enactment of a Federal law is the best way to ensure that claims to Nazi-confiscated art are adjudicated on their merits.3.PurposesThe purposes of this Act are the following:(1)To ensure that laws governing claims to Nazi-confiscated art further United States policy as set forth in the Washington Conference Principles on Nazi-Confiscated Art, the Holocaust Victims Redress Act, and the Terezin Declaration.(2)To ensure that claims to artwork stolen or… [read post]
