Search for: "L.J.-I."
Results 761 - 780
of 1,237
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2012, 12:00 am
You’ve got a week and a bit to get your shit together otherwise I’m blowing the airport sky high! [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 12:54 pm
I believe that this court should exercise its inherent power to control the processes of litigation, Chamberes v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 11:02 am
L.J. 371, 371 (2001) (class action settlements as "transactions"); Judith Resnik, Trial as Error, Jurisdiction as Injury: Transforming the Meaning of Article III, 113 Harv. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:31 am
., Ten Ways To Lose An Appeal, Part I, 53 Fed. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 9:46 pm
I'm just saying we don't need to make a federal case out of it. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 10:20 pm
In English law, despite many caustic remarks about the Duke of Westminster’s case (perhaps none better than Templeman L.J. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 3:11 pm
Theresa (Maxi) Adamski, The Alien Tort Claims Act and Corporate Liability: A Threat to the United States' International Relations, 34 Fordham Int'l L.J. 1502 (2011). [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 10:17 am
I’m pleased to announce that Professor Elizabeth A. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 4:08 pm
” Mary Kate Kearney, The Propriety of Poetry in Judicial Opinions, 12 Widener L.J. 597, 606-607 (2003). [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:31 am
(I’m only slightly exaggerating.) [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 5:54 am
L.J. 575 (1990). [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 6:33 pm
Zimmerman, Funding Irrationality, 59 Duke L.J. 1105 (2010). [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 1:05 pm
State: The Past, Present, and Future of Education Finance Litigation in California (2005) 57 Hastings L.J. 385, 388-391; see generally Wells v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
L.J. 1-95 (2010/2011). [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm
Keene L.J. emphasised that it is necessary to look at all the evidence. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm
Keene L.J. emphasised that it is necessary to look at all the evidence. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:47 am
L.J. 221 (2009) (no free link available). [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 6:07 am
(I might add that since no one has suggested this resolution I do not expect the Court to arrive at it.) [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 5:57 am
As I stated on Prof. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:01 am
The first is what I call the Brady problem. [read post]
