Search for: "Lake v. United States" Results 761 - 780 of 1,404
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2014, 9:53 am
For instance, back in 1985, Robert Levinson complained of a contract with the Eckerd Foundation for the management of the Okeechobee School for Boys in which “[v]irtually every” contract item concerned input activities and pertained to administrative/operational functions. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 8:16 am by WIMS
Utility Air Regulatory Group (UTAG) v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:52 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
” Since the Supreme Court’s 1978 opinion in Oliphant v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 10:08 am by Jordan Pascale, P.L.
COURT APPOINTED RECEIVER OVER CONDO ASSOCIATION Granada Lakes Villas Condo Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:50 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday’s second argument was in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 5:39 am by Robert Kreisman
It has been reported that six other appellate state courts across the United States have upheld punitive damage awards against Wyeth in cases involving the same menopause drug, Prempro. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 9:17 am by Lyle Denniston
  That trend began with the Supreme Court’s decision last Term (United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 6:33 am by Robert Kreisman
In the United States, 3,757 individuals died in large truck crashes in 2011. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:31 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
 In the post United States v Windsor marriage jurisprudence, couples are challenging state constitutional bans on gay marriage by metes and bounds. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 10:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
The state’s planned plea to the Supreme Court would be the first time the issue of same-sex marriage had returned to the Justices since their rulings in late June — one of which, United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 3:13 pm by Lyle Denniston
While the Supreme Court in the case of United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 9:41 pm by Lyle Denniston
United States, declaring that a religious duty to engage in polygamy was not a defense to a federal law against bigamy. [read post]