Search for: "Liability and Insurers for each Defendant"
Results 761 - 780
of 3,393
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm
The first part, CRS § 13-20-808, formalizes certain rules for construing coverage for construction professionals under "occurrence-based" commercial liability insurance policies, such as commercial general liability insurance, multi-peril insurance, and liability coverages found in builder’s risk policies. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 3:46 am
With no sign of any assistance for defendants from the policymakers, it was probably inevitable that employers’ liability insurers would start to question their own liability to insured employers. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 1:28 pm
[D&O liability policies] are not means of holdings insureds harmless from costs associated with any participation. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 9:19 am
Mutual of Omaha Life Insurance Co., __ Cal.App.4th___ (2009) be published. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 7:34 pm
As my Contracts professor told his class during my first semester of law school, insurance companies exist by collecting premiums and denying liability. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 1:11 pm
VW pointed out that all resolutions of the annual general meeting had been passed each with more than 99 percent of the votes. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:41 am
As appears to be the case in connection with WaMu, the FDIC and the BankUnited shareholders were essentially competing with each other for the same pool of insurance dollars. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 10:32 am
On or about June 19, 2007, Plaintiff Anna A. and Defendant XYZ entered into a written contract of motor vehicle bodily liability insurance which included provisions for bodily injury damages incurred by uninsured motorists. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 6:31 am
Troublingly, the standard insurance policies of many strategic acquirors—especially those that are publicly listed—may not currently cover these aiding and abetting liability risks. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 6:31 am
Troublingly, the standard insurance policies of many strategic acquirors—especially those that are publicly listed—may not currently cover these aiding and abetting liability risks. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 3:52 pm
A Lawyer said that, by Order dated March 23, 2007, this Court granted the summary judgment motions of second third-party defendant, and third-party defendant, on the grounds that there was no issue of material fact regarding the liability of those defendants. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 3:04 pm
This impermissibly shifts the burden to prove damages from the plaintiffs to the defendant. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 11:24 am
It could have been better, at least for non-drug device defendants (see the dissenting part of the concurrance/dissent), but compared to Azzarello the result is excellent.Tincher’s Impact on Drugs and Medical DevicesFirst, how does Tincheraffect drugs and medical devices, the primary focus of this blog? [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 8:42 am
Defendants held a directors' and liability insurance policy and an errors omissions insurance policy. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 2:12 am
The typical D&O liability insurance policy would not likely cover any fines or penalties imposed on corporate officials for their control person liability, but their expenses incurred in defending against the claims likely would be covered under the typical policy, as would their defense expenses and any settlements or judgments against them in any follow-on civil litigation. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 11:29 am
One final thing that D&O insurance underwriters will want to note is that this ’33 Act liability lawsuit was brought in state court against Pitney Bowes, a company whose shares were publicly traded prior to the debt offering that was the subject of the lawsuit. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 4:46 pm
After all, in a system with mandated liability coverage, the insurance policy is what makes it legal for the policyholder to even get behind the wheel. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 7:25 am
The panel’s sole duty is to express its opinion as to whether or not the evidence supports the conclusion that the defendant or defendants acted or failed to act within the appropriate standard or care or whether there is a material issue of fact, not requiring expert opinion, bearing on liability for consideration by the court. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 12:43 pm
Further, assume you are an additional insured under each hypothetical policy and there is a valid $75,000 claim for which you are liable and which falls under each policy’s coverage. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 10:08 am
The court construed the ambiguous “majority interest” provision broadly and in favor of the insured, holding that the insurers were required to defend the underlying product recall lawsuits. [read post]
